Cited by 106Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Safety and tolerability of rifaximin for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome without constipation: a pooled analysis of randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials

Open access
Schoenfeld, P., Pimentel, M., Chang, L., Lembo, A., Chey, W. D., Yu, J., Paterson, C., Bortey, E. +1 more·2014·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: The efficacy of rifaximin, a nonsystemic, gut‐targeted antibiotic for reducing non–constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (non‐C IBS) symptoms, has been demonstrated in one phase 2b and two phase 3 randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials, but detailed data about rifaximin safety and tolerability during treatment and subsequent follow‐up periods are lacking. Aim: To assess and determine the frequency of rifaximin and placebo adverse events (AE s) in phase 2b and phase 3 non‐C IBS trials. Methods: A post hoc pooled safety analysis of the phase 2b (rifaximin 275, 550, and 1100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks; 550 mg twice daily for 4 weeks) and phase 3 (rifaximin 550 mg three times daily for 2 weeks) studies was performed. Data on treatment and post‐treatment AE s were collected. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks and 10 weeks post‐treatment in the phase 2b and phase 3 trials, respectively. Results: Patients receiving rifaximin (n = 1103) and placebo (n = 829) had a similar incidence of drug‐related AE s (12.1% vs. 10.7%), serious AE s (1.5% vs. 2.2%), drug‐related AE s resulting in study discontinuation (0.8% vs. 0.8%), gastrointestinal‐associated AE s (12.2% vs. 12.2%) and infection‐associated AE s (8.5% vs. 9.5%). There were no cases of Clostridium difficile colitis or deaths. Conclusions: The safety and tolerability profile of rifaximin during treatment and post‐treatment was comparable to placebo. Future research should define the safety and tolerability profile, including risk of C. difficile colitis and microbial antibiotic resistance, with repeated courses of rifaximin in patients with non—constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 00269412, NCT 00731679, and NCT 00724126).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.12735

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A pooled analysis by Schoenfeld et al confirmed the safety and tolerability profile of rifaximin in comparison with placebo, with similar incidence of drug-related adverse events.

    “a pooled analysis by Schoenfeld et al [292] has confirmed the safety and tolerability profile of rifaximin in comparison with placebo, with similar incidence of drug-related adverse events”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenfeld, P., Pimentel, M., Chang, L., Lembo, A., Chey, W. D., Yu, J., Paterson, C., Bortey, E., & Forbes, W. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenfeld, P.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-03
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1161-1168
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2061365505
Cited by
106
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
rifaximin, drug safety, tolerability, adverse events, gastrointestinal adverse effects, infection-related adverse events, Clostridium difficile colitis, antibiotic resistance, post-treatment follow-up
MeSH terms
Rifaximin, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Agents, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rifamycins, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review