Cited by 22Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Evidence-Based Neonatal Bereavement Care

Kendall, Alison, Guo, Wenxiang·2008·Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.nainr.2008.06.011

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendall, A., & Guo, W.
Affiliations
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Kendall, Alison
Venue
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
131-135
ISSN
1527-3369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062367047
Cited by
22
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
parental grief, neonatal intensive care, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, family support, parental communication, follow-up care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review