Cited by 6Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Australian fathers’ experiences of support following neonatal death: a need for better access to diverse support options

Open access
Azeez, Shazleen, Obst, Kate Louise, Oxlad, Melissa, Due, Clemence, Middleton, Philippa·2021·Journal of Perinatology

Abstract

Objective To explore fathers' experiences of support following neonatal death, including the availability and perceived adequacy of support, barriers and facilitators to support and desired support.Study design Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten Australian fathers who had experienced the death of a baby in the neonatal period at least 6 months previously. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results Two overarching themes were identified: From hospital to home: Continuity of care and Self and community barriers to support. Fathers who could access the support they required found this to be beneficial. Overall, however, supports were perceived as inadequate in variety and availability, with more follow-up support from the hospital desired. Fathers highlighted limited opportunities to form emotional connections with others and a strong desire to talk about their baby.Conclusion Healthcare professionals and support organisations can more effectively assist fathers by increasing the variety of supports available and facilitating follow-up or referrals after hospital discharge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41372-021-01210-7

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azeez, S., Obst, K. L., Oxlad, M., Due, C., & Middleton, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Azeez, Shazleen
Venue
Journal of Perinatology
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2722-2729
ISSN
  • 0743-8346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5543
OpenAlex
W3200298157
Cited by
6
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
neonatal death, fathers, bereavement support, grief, continuity of care, hospital discharge, barriers to support, community support, emotional connection, follow-up support, fathers' experiences
MeSH terms
Australia, Fathers, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Patient Discharge, Qualitative Research, Racial Groups, Perinatal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review