Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sinusoidal Ultrastructure Evaluated During the Revascularization of Regenerating Rat Liver

Wack, Kathryn E., Ross, Mark A., Zegarra, Vasthy, Sysko, Laura R., Watkins, Simon C., Stolz, Donna Beer·2001·Hepatology

Abstract

Sinusoidal endothelial cell (SEC) porosities were compared between the periportal (zone 1) and pericentral (zone 3) regions of the rat liver during regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PHx). SEC porosities and fenestration diameters were measured in control livers, as well as at 5 minutes, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours, and 14 days following PHx. Bimodal maximums in both porosity and fenestration diameters were observed in both zones at 5 minutes and 5 days following PHx. SEC porosities increased significantly in both zones 1 and 3 within 5 minutes following PHx, but the increase was maintained only in zone 1 at 24 hours after resection. Following the initial rise, both zones displayed a gradual decrease to less than half their porosity values at 72 hr post–PHx. After 72 hours, porosities increased to over control levels and remained elevated until 14 days after PHx. The decrease in porosity at 72 hr post–PHx is accompanied by ultrastructural changes within the sinusoid at this time. Vascular corrosion casting and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) show sinusoid compression resulting from increased hepatic plate widths due to hepatocyte proliferation in the absence of SEC proliferation. Also at this time, we observed many SEC completely enveloped by stellate cells. The zonal variations observed for porosities throughout regeneration did not correlate with changes in laminin, collagen I and IV, or fibronectin deposition within the space of Disse. Taken together, the data reveal that SEC are dynamic regulators of porosity that respond rapidly and locally to environmental zonal stimuli during liver regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jhep.2001.21998

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Wack, K. E., Ross, M. A., Zegarra, V., Sysko, L. R., Watkins, S. C., & Stolz, D. B.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2001-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
363-378
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137597973
Cited by
168
References
2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sinusoidal Ultrastructure Evaluated During the Revascularization of Regenerating Rat Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2001.21998
The paper
Wack, K. E., Ross, M. A., Zegarra, V., Sysko, L. R., Watkins, S. C., & Stolz, D. B. (2001). Sinusoidal Ultrastructure Evaluated During the Revascularization of Regenerating Rat Liver. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.21998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.