The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fetal wound repair results in scar formation in interleukin-10–deficient mice in a syngeneic murine model of scarless fetal wound repair
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal dermal wound healing is characterized by minimal inflammation, restoration of normal dermal architecture, and scarless repair. The authors have shown that proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) are diminished during fetal wound repair. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an antiinflammatory cytokine that decreases production of IL-6 and IL-8. The authors hypothesized that diminished IL-6 and IL-8 and minimal inflammation may be caused by IL-10. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, the authors developed a new syngeneic murine model of fetal wound repair in which 15-day-gestation skin from either normal C57BL/6 or transgenic C57BL/6 IL-10 knockout mice was grafted to the back of the same strain adult mice. The grafts were incisionally wounded after 5 days, harvested at 1 week, and analyzed for inflammatory response and scar formation. RESULTS: Wounds in normal fetal skin grafts showed minimal inflammation and normal dermal reticular collagen pattern at the site of the wound, consistent with scarless repair. In contrast, wounds in IL-10 knockout fetal skin grafts showed significant inflammation and scar formation. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal skin grafts on adult syngeneic mice heal without inflammation or scar formation. The absence of IL-10 in fetal skin results in scar formation. Intrinsic lack of IL-10 may result in continued amplification of the inflammatory cytokine cascade, continued stimulation of fibroblasts, and abnormal collagen deposition. IL-10 is necessary for scarless wound repair to occur.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines
WERNER, S., & GROSE, R. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835 · Cited by 3,629
Inflammation in Wound Repair: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms
Eming, S. A., Krieg, T., & Davidson, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700701 · Cited by 2,429
Topical Delivery of Silver Nanoparticles Promotes Wound Healing
Tian, J., Wong, K. K. Y., Ho, C., Lok, C., Yu, W., Che, C., Chiu, J., & Tam, P. K. H. (2007) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200600171 · Cited by 983
Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration
Godwin, J. W., Pinto, A. R., & Rosenthal, N. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1300290110 · Cited by 829
Macrophage Dysfunction Impairs Resolution of Inflammation in the Wounds of Diabetic Mice
Khanna, S., Biswas, S., Shang, Y., Collard, E., Azad, A., Kauh, C., Bhasker, V., Gordillo, G. M., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009539 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Authors
- Liechty, K. W., Kim, H. B., Adzick, N. S., & Crombleholme, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 866-873
- ISSN
- 0022-3468 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975557439
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fetal wound repair results in scar formation in interleukin-10–deficient mice in a syngeneic murine model of scarless fetal wound repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jpsu.2000.6868
- The paper
- Liechty, K. W., Kim, H. B., Adzick, N. S., & Crombleholme, T. M. (2000). Fetal wound repair results in scar formation in interleukin-10–deficient mice in a syngeneic murine model of scarless fetal wound repair. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.6868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.