Cited by 829Planarian Biology and ElectrostimulationWound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration

Open access
Godwin, James W., Pinto, Alexander R., Rosenthal, Nadia A.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The failure to replace damaged body parts in adult mammals results from a muted growth response and fibrotic scarring. Although infiltrating immune cells play a major role in determining the variable outcome of mammalian wound repair, little is known about the modulation of immune cell signaling in efficiently regenerating species such as the salamander, which can regrow complete body structures as adults. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of immune signaling during limb regeneration in axolotl, an aquatic salamander, and reveal a temporally defined requirement for macrophage infiltration in the regenerative process. Although many features of mammalian cytokine/chemokine signaling are retained in the axolotl, they are more dynamically deployed, with simultaneous induction of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers within the first 24 h after limb amputation. Systemic macrophage depletion during this period resulted in wound closure but permanent failure of limb regeneration, associated with extensive fibrosis and disregulation of extracellular matrix component gene expression. Full limb regenerative capacity of failed stumps was restored by reamputation once endogenous macrophage populations had been replenished. Promotion of a regeneration-permissive environment by identification of macrophage-derived therapeutic molecules may therefore aid in the regeneration of damaged body parts in adult mammals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1300290110

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adult salamander limb and zebrafish fin regeneration, innate immune cell influx, particularly macrophages, preceding blastema formation is essential for regeneration.

    “yet, recent studies in both adult salamander limb and zebrafish fin regeneration indicate that an innate immune cell influx, particularly of macrophages, preceding blastema formation is an essential component of regeneration (134, 135).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Levesque M, Villiard E, Roy S (2010) Skin wound healing in axolotls: A scarless process. (Translated from eng). J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 314(8):684-697.
  2. Carlson MR, Bryant SV, Gardiner DM (1998) Expression of Msx-2 during development, regeneration, and wound healing in axolotl limbs. J Exp Zool 282(6):715-723.
  3. Asahina K, Obara M, Yoshizato K (1999) Expression of genes of type I and type II collagen in the formation and development of the blastema of regenerating newt limb. Dev Dyn 216(1):59-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godwin, J. W., Pinto, A. R., & Rosenthal, N. A.
Affiliations
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Godwin, James W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
110
Issue
23
Pages
9415-9420
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155490506
Cited by
829
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 10
FWCI
26.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Stem Cells Australia
  • State Government of Victoria
  • Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
macrophages, limb regeneration, axolotl, salamander regeneration, macrophage depletion, wound healing, fibrosis, extracellular matrix, immune cell infiltration, amputation
MeSH terms
Ambystoma mexicanum, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Extremities, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Gene Expression Regulation, Histological Techniques, Immunohistochemistry, Macrophages, Phagocytosis, Regeneration, Wound Healing, Signal Transduction, Cytokines, Myeloid Cells, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review