Cited by 26Reproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Expression of Apoptosis in Placentae from Mice Lacking the Prostaglandin F Receptor

Mu, J., Kanzaki, T., Tomimatsu, T., Fukuda, H., Wasada, K., Fujii, E., Endoh, M., Kozuki, M. +3 more·2002·Placenta

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the changes in apoptosis in the placenta and decidua of pregnant mice lacking the prostaglandin F receptor. Mouse placentae were removed from fetuses on days 10-23 of pregnancy. Apoptotic cells were examined by a DNA fragmentation assay and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDP nick end-labelling (TUNEL) technique. The placenta and decidual weight increased before day 18 and 14 of pregnancy, and then decreased with gestational day. After day 19, the fetuses gradually died in the uterus. All fetuses died in the uterus on day 23 of pregnancy. The number of apoptosis was not significantly different between wild type and FP-deficient mice before day 18 of pregnancy by DNA fragmentation and TUNEL staining. The DNA fragmentation was always more pronounced in decidual tissue on each day of pregnancy. DNA laddering on placentae was more extensive on day 22 than day 18. In placenta, most TUNEL-positive cells were detected in trophoblast and stromal cells. A higher intensity of apoptotic cells was in the decidual basalis. The main area was the centre of the decidual basalis, and was in decrease toward to margin of placenta. The index of TUNEL positive cells increased as gestation progressed toward termination. Especially, it was prominent in the placentae on day 22 compared with that day 18 of pregnancy. The increased TUNEL-positive staining in syncytiotrophoblast surface was found in placenta at post-term, compared with those at term. Apoptosis may provide insights into both normal placental development and placental dysfunction during an abnormal pregnancy from post-term pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/plac.2001.0759

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mu, J., Kanzaki, T., Tomimatsu, T., Fukuda, H., Wasada, K., Fujii, E., Endoh, M., Kozuki, M., Murata, Y., Sugimoto, Y., & Ichikawa, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Placenta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
23
Issue
2-3
Pages
215-223
ISSN
0143-4004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151314502
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Placenta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
apoptosis, prostaglandin F receptor, decidua, trophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, placental development, prolonged pregnancy, placental insufficiency, abortion, DNA fragmentation, TUNEL staining
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Decidua, DNA, Female, Male, Organ Size, Placenta, Pregnancy, Receptors, Prostaglandin, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Mice, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review