Cited by 40Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Glycaemic Control is Correlated with Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes

Papanas, N., Tsapas, A., Papatheodorou, K., Papazoglou, D., Bekiari, E., Sariganni, M., Paletas, K., Maltezos, E.·2010·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to examine the potential correlation of WHO-5 well-being index with glycaemic control and chronic complications in subjects with type 2 diabetes. The study included 156 subjects (73 men, mean age 64.05+/-9.11 years, mean diabetes duration 12.22+/-5.61 years). Well-being was assessed by the WHO-5 score via a validated questionnaire comprising 5 questions (Q1-Q5). HbA (1c) showed a significant negative correlation with overall WHO-5 score (r (s)=-0.248, p=0.002) and individual Q1-Q4 scores (r (s)=-0.262, p=0.001; r (s)=-0.248, p=0.002; r (s)=-0.207, p=0.009 and r (s)=-0.169, p=0.035 respectively). Subjects with adequate glycaemic control (HbA (1c) < 7%, n=67) had a significantly higher WHO-5 score in comparison to those with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA (1c) >or= 7%, n=89) (mean+/-SD: 19.69+/-5.47 vs. mean+/-SD: 17.11+/-6.38, p=0.011). Finally, WHO-5 score was significantly (p=0.013) lower in subjects with neuropathic pain than in those without neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetic subjects, glycaemic control shows a significant correlation with well-being, while neuropathic pain is associated with lower well-being score.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0029-1243623

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In type 2 diabetes, positive psychological states are prospectively associated with lower HbA1c, fewer diabetes complications, and lower rates of cardiac events/mortality.

    “In T2D, positive psychological states (e.g., positive affect, well-being) are prospectively associated with lower HbA1c, fewer diabetes complications, and lower rates of cardiac events/mortality [26–28]”
  • Among people with diabetes, positive psychological attributes like optimism and positive affect correlate with better medical results, such as improved glucose control and reduced mortality.

    “In patients with diabetes, psychological well-being constructs (e.g., optimism, positive affect) have been associated with superior medical outcomes, including better glucose control and lower mortality rates.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papanas, N., Tsapas, A., Papatheodorou, K., Papazoglou, D., Bekiari, E., Sariganni, M., Paletas, K., & Maltezos, E.
Affiliations
  • Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2010-02-05
Volume
118
Issue
06
Pages
364-367
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W1992002699
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, well-being, WHO-5, HbA1c, neuropathic pain, chronic complications, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude to Health, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Neuropathies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review