Cited by 69Diabetes Management and EducationPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCancer survivorship and care

Positive Emotional Health and Diabetes Care: Concepts, Measurement, and Clinical Implications

Robertson, Suzanne M., Stanley, Melinda A., Cully, Jeffrey A., Naik, Aanand D.·2012·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background Numerous studies describe the effect of emotional problems, including diabetes-related distress and depression, on diabetes outcomes. Little attention has been devoted to positive emotional health and its potential role in facilitating patients' self-management and improved outcomes.Objective This review describes the conceptualization and measurement of three empirically-tested aspects of positive emotional health (well-being, positive affect, resilience) in the diabetes literature and their relationship to diabetes outcomes.Method A literature review was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases from 1970 to January 2011 to identify studies focused on well-being, positive affect, and resilience in diabetes patients.Results Twenty-two studies were identified based on our inclusion criteria. Well-being studies were least likely to include conceptualizations and relied on two primary measurement instruments compared to more heterogeneous presentations found in positive affect and resilience studies. All three aspects of positive emotional health were linked to health-related outcomes and self-management.Conclusion Positive emotional health may facilitate chronic care self-management and improved health outcomes. We present a model to guide future research and intervention development efforts designed to enhance positive emotional health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2011.09.008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, S. M., Stanley, M. A., Cully, J. A., & Naik, A. D.
Affiliations
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Robertson, Suzanne M.
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067362639
Cited by
69
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K23AG027144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, well-being, positive affect, resilience, diabetes self-management, diabetes distress, depression, health outcomes, measurement instruments, chronic care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Diabetes Mellitus, Emotions, Happiness, Humans, Models, Psychological, Quality of Life, Self Care, Self Concept, Databases, Bibliographic, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review