Cited by 28Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchCancer survivorship and care

Distress and Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care: Putting the Pieces Together

Open access
Hoogendoorn, Claire J, Schechter, Clyde B, Llabre, Maria M, Walker, Elizabeth A, Gonzalez, Jeffrey S·2021·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Conflicting research emphasizes depression, diabetes distress, or well-being in relation to diabetes self-care and risk for poor health outcomes. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test whether a latent variable for general psychological distress derived from shared variance of depression symptoms, diabetes distress, and well-being predicts a latent variable of diabetes self-care and to examine evidence for unique effects once shared effects are adjusted for. Methods: Adults with suboptimally controlled diabetes were recruited from the South Bronx, NY, for a telephonic diabetes self-management support trial. Baseline diabetes self-care, medication adherence, depression symptoms, diabetes distress, and well-being were measured by validated self-report. Structural equation modeling specified a latent variable for general psychological distress derived from shared variance of depression symptoms, diabetes distress, and well-being. Diabetes self-care was a latent variable indicated by diet, glucose self-monitoring, and medication adherence. Results: Participants (N = 627, 65% female) were predominantly ethnic minority (70% Hispanic; 45% Black) and 77% reported household income <$20K/year. Mean (standard deviation) age = 56 (12) years; A1c = 9.1% (1.9%); body mass index = 32 (8) kg/m2. The latent variable for psychological distress was a robust predictor of poorer diabetes self-care (coefficient = −0.59 [confidence interval = −0.71, −0.46], p < .001) with good model fit. Unique paths from depression symptoms, diabetes distress, and well-being (all ps > .99) to self-care were not observed. Conclusions: In this population of disadvantaged adults with suboptimally controlled diabetes, general psychological distress was strongly associated with poorer diabetes self-care and fully accounted for the effects of depression, diabetes distress, and positive well-being. This suggests that general distress may underlie previously reported associations between these constructs and diabetes self-care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/abm/kaaa070

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of diabetes distress are known to negatively affect self-care behaviors, medication adherence, and glycemic control.

    “This finding is clinically important, as high levels of diabetes distress are known to negatively affect self-care behaviors, medication adherence, and glycemic control [40-42].”

    From Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports research associating diabetes-related distress with problematic self-care and glycemic control, and the Abstract identifies medication adherence as part of the self-care measure. But the paper calls the literature inconclusive and finds that diabetes distress has no independent association with self-care after accounting for general psychological distress. These associations do not establish that high diabetes distress itself negatively affects all three outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoogendoorn, C. J., Schechter, C. B., Llabre, M. M., Walker, E. A., & Gonzalez, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Yeshiva University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Hoogendoorn, Claire J
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
938-948
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W3086578826
Cited by
28
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18 DK078077)
  • Einstein-Mount Sinai Diabetes Research Center,
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (P30 DK020541)
  • New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research (P30 DK111022)
  • David and Jane Willner Bloomgarden Family Fellowship Fund (R01 DK104845, R18 DK098742, R01 DK121298, R01 DK121896)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
diabetes self-care, psychological distress, diabetes distress, depression, well-being, medication adherence, self-monitoring of blood glucose, diet, Hispanic adults, ethnic minority health, diabetes self-management support, shared variance
MeSH terms
Ethnic and Racial Minorities, Adult, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Self Care, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review