Cited by 96Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle activation and electromyography studiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Time Course of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Knee Extensor Eccentric Training

Baroni, B., Rodrigues, R., Franke, R., Geremia, J., Rassier, D., Vaz, M.·2013·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

This study investigated the chronology of neural and morphological adaptations to knee extensor eccentric training and their contribution to strength gains in isometric, concentric and eccentric muscle actions. 20 male healthy subjects performed a 12-week eccentric training program on an isokinetic dynamometer, and neuromuscular evaluations of knee extensors were performed every 4 weeks. After 12 training weeks, significant increases were observed for: isometric (24%), concentric (15%) and eccentric (29%) torques; isometric (29%) and eccentric (33%) electromyographic activity; muscle thickness (10%) and anatomical cross-sectional area (19%). Eccentric and isometric torques increased progressively until the end of the program. Concentric torque and muscle mass parameters increased until the eighth training week, but did not change from this point to the twelfth training week. Eccentric and isometric activation increased at 4 and 8 training weeks, respectively, while no change was found in concentric activation. These results suggest that: 1) the relative increment in concentric strength was minor and does not relate to neural effects; 2) eccentric and isometric strength gains up to 8 training weeks are explained by the increased neural activation and muscle mass, whereas the increments in the last 4 training weeks seem to be associated with other mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0032-1333263

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baroni, B., Rodrigues, R., Franke, R., Geremia, J., Rassier, D., & Vaz, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Baroni, B.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
904-911
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2080395995
Cited by
96
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
eccentric training, knee extensors, neuromuscular adaptation, strength gain, torque, muscle thickness, anatomical cross-sectional area, muscle hypertrophy, time course of adaptation, isokinetic training
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Electromyography, Exercise Test, Humans, Knee, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Muscle Contraction, Time Factors, Ultrasonography, Torque, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer, Resistance Training, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review