Cited by 660Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle Physiology and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training

Seynnes, O. R., de Boer, M., Narici, M. V.·2007·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The onset of whole muscle hypertrophy in response to overloading is poorly documented. The purpose of this study was to assess the early changes in muscle size and architecture during a 35-day high-intensity resistance training (RT) program. Seven young healthy volunteers performed bilateral leg extension three times per week on a gravity-independent flywheel ergometer. Cross-sectional area (CSA) in the central (C) and distal (D) regions of the quadriceps femoris (QF), muscle architecture, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and electromyographic (EMG) activity were measured before and after 10, 20, and 35 days of RT. By the end of the training period, MVC and EMG activity increased by 38.9 +/- 5.7 and 34.8% +/- 4.7%, respectively. Significant increase in QF CSA (3.5 and 5.2% in the C and D regions, respectively) was observed after 20 days of training, along with a 2.4 +/- 0.7% increase in fascicle length from the 10th day of training. By the end of the 35-day training period, the total increase in QF CSA for regions C and D was 6.5 +/- 1.1 and 7.4 +/- 0.8%, respectively, and fascicle length and pennation angle increased by 9.9 +/- 1.2 and 7.7 +/- 1.3%, respectively. The results show for the first time that changes in muscle size are detectable after only 3 wk of RT and that remodeling of muscle architecture precedes gains in muscle CSA. Muscle hypertrophy seems to contribute to strength gains earlier than previously reported; flywheel training seems particularly effective for inducing these early structural adaptations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2006

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seynnes, O. R., de Boer, M., & Narici, M. V.
Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2007-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
368-373
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2143870509
Cited by
660
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
skeletal muscle hypertrophy, high-intensity resistance training, muscle architecture, quadriceps, cross-sectional area, fascicle length, pennation angle, flywheel training, leg extension, maximal voluntary contraction, muscle electrical activity, muscle strength gain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Muscle Contraction, Time Factors, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Ergometry, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review