Cited by 27Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Limited Benefit of Fatmax-Test to Derive Training Prescriptions

Schwindling, S., Scharhag-Rosenberger, F., Kindermann, W., Meyer, T.·2013·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation (Fatmax) is recommended for training fat metabolism. However, it remains unclear whether Fatmax leads to the highest fat oxidation rates during prolonged exercise. It was hypothesized that there are no differences in fat oxidation rates among 3 different exercise intensities. Therefore, fat metabolism was compared among 1-h constant load tests at Fatmax, a higher and a lower intensity. A cohort of 16 male cyclists (28±6 yrs, BMI: 22.5±1.2 kg/m2; n=8 with maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max] of 50-60 ml/min/kg [ET]; n=8 with VO2max>60 ml/min/kg [HET]) completed a maximal incremental cycling test, a submaximal incremental Fatmax-test and, thereafter, three 1-h constant-load tests in randomized order at Fatmax, one exercise stage below (LOW) and one above (HIGH). LOW, Fatmax and HIGH were performed at 52±13, 60±13 and 70±12% VO2max. Heart rate and blood lactate were significantly different (p<0.001). However, the fat oxidation rate showed no difference (p=0.61). This was also true within each subgroup (ET: p=0.69, HET p=0.61). In conclusion, the fat oxidation rate of endurance trained cyclists shows no difference between 1-h constant load exercise bouts at about 50-70% VO2max. The precision and necessity of Fatmax-tests for controlling the training of fat oxidation are therefore debatable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0033-1349106

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moderate-intensity aerobic training (AT) has the highest fat-burning efficiency since it is performed closest to the maximum fat oxidation intensity (FATmax).

    “Previously, the prevailing view was that moderate-intensity aerobic training (AT) has the highest fat-burning efficiency since it is performed closest to the maximum fat oxidation intensity (FATmax) [2].”

    From High-intensity interval training or lactate administration combined with aerobic training enhances visceral fat loss while promoting VMH neuroplasticity in female rats (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Abstract (page not provided) says training at Fatmax had been recommended for fat metabolism, supporting the claim's description of a prior view. It does not establish that moderate-intensity training has the highest fat-burning efficiency: in the cyclists studied, fat oxidation did not differ across one-hour bouts at Fatmax and the lower and higher intensities. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwindling, S., Scharhag-Rosenberger, F., Kindermann, W., & Meyer, T.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
Corresponding author
Schwindling, S.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
35
Issue
04
Pages
280-285
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2092497854
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
fat oxidation, exercise intensity, training prescription, endurance training, cyclists, blood lactate, heart rate, VO2max, fat metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Calorimetry, Indirect, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Respiration, Anaerobic Threshold, Lactic Acid, Lipid Metabolism, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review