Cited by 93Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

Assessment of maximal fat oxidation during exercise: A systematic review

Amaro‐Gahete, Francisco J., Sanchez‐Delgado, Guillermo, Jurado‐Fasoli, Lucas, De‐la‐O, Alejandro, Castillo, Manuel J., Helge, Jørn W., Ruiz, Jonatan R.·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Maximal fat oxidation during exercise (MFO) and the exercise intensity eliciting MFO (Fat max ) are considered biological markers of metabolic health and performance. A wide range of studies have been performed to increase our knowledge about their regulation by exercise and/or nutritional intervention. However, numerous data collection and analysis approaches have been applied, which may have affected the MFO and Fat max estimation. We aimed to systematically review the available studies describing and/or comparing different data collection and analysis approach factors that could affect MFO and Fat max estimation in healthy individuals and patients. Two independent researchers performed the search. We included all original studies in which MFO and/or Fat max were estimated by indirect calorimetry through an incremental graded exercise protocol published from 2002 to 2019. This systematic review provides key information about the factors that could affect MFO and Fat max estimation: ergometer type, metabolic cart used, warm‐up duration and intensity, stage duration and intensities imposed in the graded exercise protocol, time interval selected for data analysis, stoichiometric equation selected to estimate fat oxidation, data analysis approach, time of the day when the test was performed, fasting time/previous meal before the test, and testing days for MFO/Fat max and maximal oxygen uptake assessment. We suggest that researchers measuring MFO and Fat max should take into account these key methodological issues that can considerably affect the accuracy, validity, and reliability of the measurement. Likewise, when comparing different studies, it is important to check whether the above‐mentioned key methodological issues are similar in such studies to avoid ambiguous and unacceptable comparisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.13424

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amaro‐Gahete, F. J., Sanchez‐Delgado, G., Jurado‐Fasoli, L., De‐la‐O, A., Castillo, M. J., Helge, J. W., & Ruiz, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity Research Group (PROFITH), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences University of Granada Granada Spain
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Amaro‐Gahete, Francisco J.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-21
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
910-921
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W2925977995
Cited by
93
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad de Granada (Excellence actions: Units of Excellence (UCEES))
  • Junta de Andalucía (SOMM17/6107/UGR)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
maximal fat oxidation, indirect calorimetry, methodological factors, metabolic cart, warm-up, stoichiometric equations, time of day, fasting, reliability and validity
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Calorimetry, Indirect, Fasting, Humans, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxygen Consumption, Exercise, Ergometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review