The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Drug Development: Industry Perspective
Abstract
Despite intensive ongoing research, drug-induced live injury (DILI) remains a serious issue for care providers and patients, and has been a major cause of drug withdrawal and non-approval by regulatory authorities in the past 50 years. Consequently, DILI remains a major concern for the pharmaceutical industry and a leading cause for attrition during drug development. In most instances, severe DILI is an uncommon idiosyncratic reaction, which typically does not present during preclinical phases or early clinical phases of drug development. In the majority of cases, drugs that caused severe DILI in humans have not shown clear and consistent hepatotoxic signals in preclinical assessment including animal studies, cell cultures, or other methods. Despite intensive efforts to develop better biomarkers that would help in predicting DILI risk in earlier phases of drug development, such biomarkers are currently not supported by sufficient evidence and are not yet available for routine use by drug makers. Due to the lack of effective and accurate methods for prediction of idiosyncratic DILI during preclinical phases of drug development, different drug makers have adopted different approaches, which are often not supported by strong systematic evidence. Based on growing experience, it is becoming increasingly evident that milder forms of liver injury occurring during clinical development, when assessed correctly, may significantly enhance our ability to predict the drug's potential to c…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most specific indicator that a drug is hepatotoxic is the occurrence of drug-induced hepatocellular injury with jaundice and/or an increased international normalised ratio.
“Therefore, the most specific indicator that a drug is hepatotoxic is the occurrence of drug-induced hepatocellular injury with jaundice, and/or an increased international normalised ratio.82”
From Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report (2023) · cites this paper as [82]
A much better understanding of the mechanisms underlying DILI and DI-ALH is essential to design improved predictive models.
“A much better understanding of the mechanisms underlying DILI and DI-ALH is essential to design improved predictive models.82”
From Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report (2023) · cites this paper as [82]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Andrade, R. J., Chalasani, N., Björnsson, E. S., Suzuki, A., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Watkins, P. B., Devarbhavi, H., Merz, M., Lucena, M. I., Kaplowitz, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0105-0 · Cited by 924
Drug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes
Hoofnagle, J. H., & Björnsson, E. S. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1816149 · Cited by 652
Chen, M., Suzuki, A., Thakkar, S., Yu, K., Hu, C., & Tong, W. (2016) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.02.015 · Cited by 398
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., de Boer, Y. S., Liberal, R., Gerbes, A., Regev, A., Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli, B., Schramm, C., Kleiner, D. E., De Martin, E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.033 · Cited by 166
Self-citationRecent advances in AI-based toxicity prediction for drug discovery
Lee, H., Kim, J., Kim, J.-W., & Lee, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2025.1632046 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Regev, A.
- Affiliations
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Venue
- Seminars in Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2014-05-31
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 227-239
- ISSN
- 0272-8087
- 1098-8971
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review