Cited by 48Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Lupus Anticoagulants and Thrombosis: Clinical Association of Different Coagulation and Immunologic Tests

Dlott, Jeffrey, Norbis, Francesca, Ruggeri, Luisa, Cler, Linda, Triplett, Douglas, Barbui, Tiziano, Galli, Monica·2000·Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

The dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and the kaolin clotting time (KCT) are two among the most commonly used coagulation tests for the detection of lupus anticoagulants. The dRVVT seems superior to the KCT in identifying LA-positive patients at risk of thrombosis. However, this relationship is greatly influenced by both the source of reagents and the instrumentation employed to carry out the assays. Therefore, 4 dRVVTs ("home-made" dRVVT, DVV test, Bioclot LA, LA Screen), and one KCT (Kaoclot) were performed in two centers and compared for their retrospective correlation with the thrombotic complications of 72 patients with a previously established diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants. Two other assays ("home-made" KCT, and Colloidal Silica Clotting Time, CSCT) were performed in one of the two centers, and compared with Kaoclot for their clinical correlations in the same population of patients, 44 of whom (61%) had suffered from arterial and/or venous thrombosis. A rather good degree of inter-laboratory and inter-assay correlations of the different tests was found. However, a statistically significant association with thrombosis was found only with the coagulation profile generated using the "home-made" dRVVT. When the commercially available dRVVTs were used, none of the coagulation profiles remained associated with thrombosis. When the assays were analyzed separately, the association with thrombosis was statistically significant for LA screen (p = 0.0019), DVV test (p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0037-1614164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that the association between LA detection and clinical events is stronger for dRVVT than aPTT.

    “There is some evidence that the association between LA detection and clinical events is stronger for dRVVT than aPTT [45].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dlott, J., Norbis, F., Ruggeri, L., Cler, L., Triplett, D., Barbui, T., & Galli, M.
Affiliations
Ball Memorial Hospital (US)
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2000
Volume
84
Issue
12
Pages
1012-1016
ISSN
  • 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2567-689X
OpenAlex
W46715830
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione “Paolo Belli per la lotta alla leucemia”
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, thrombosis, dilute Russell's viper venom time, kaolin clotting time, venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, coagulation tests, interlaboratory comparison, assay comparison, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Blood Coagulation Tests, Cardiolipins, Female, Glycoproteins, Humans, Immunologic Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Prothrombin, Prothrombin Time, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Retrospective Studies, Thrombosis, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review