Cited by 15Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Diagnostic Challenges on the Laboratory Detection of Lupus Anticoagulant

Open access
Tripodi, Armando·2021·Biomedicines

Abstract

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three laboratory parameters (the others being antibodies to either cardiolipin or β2-glycoprotein I) which defines the rare but potentially devastating condition known as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Testing for LA is a challenging task for the clinical laboratory because specific tests for its detection are not available. However, proper LA detection is paramount for patients’ management, as its persistent positivity in the presence of (previous or current) thrombotic events, candidate for long term anticoagulation. Guidelines for LA detection have been established and updated over the last two decades. Implementation of these guidelines across laboratories and participation to external quality assessment schemes are required to help standardize the diagnostic procedures and help clinicians for appropriate management of APS. This article aims to review the current state of the art and the challenges that clinical laboratories incur in the detection of LA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biomedicines9070844

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In clinical practice, enrolment of 120 subjects is difficult; an alternative could be the use of manufacturer-provided cut-offs, assuming that these derive from a correct procedure in terms of population selection, statistical method, etc.

    “In clinical practice, the enrolment of 120 subjects is difficult (especially for small laboratories); an alternative could be the use of manufacturer-provided cut-offs (assuming that these derive from a correct procedure in terms of population selection, statistical method, etc.).”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    Section 7, “Cut-Off Values,” says enrolling 120 or more healthy subjects is impractical, especially for small laboratories, and identifies manufacturer cut-offs as a possible alternative. But it requires those cut-offs to be checked locally for accuracy using 20 or 40 subjects; assuming the manufacturer used a correct procedure is not the condition the paper gives. The section also cautions against using cut-offs determined elsewhere without local validation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even if factor VIII inhibitors require incubation to express their activity, if present at very high titre, they immediately neutralize factor VIII of NPP in the aPTT mixing procedure, making them indistinguishable from LA.

    “Even if these inhibitors require incubation to express their activity (2 h at 37 °C), if they are present at very high titre, they immediately neutralize factor VIII of NPP in the aPTT mixing procedure, thus making them indistinguishable from LA [8].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    Section 11 says factor VIII inhibitors generally exert their activity after incubation for 2 hours at 37 °C, but high-potency inhibitors are likely to inhibit factor VIII in pooled normal plasma immediately during mixing, making them indistinguishable from LA. The citing sentence states immediate neutralization as certain, whereas the source qualifies it as likely. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reagents containing a low concentration of phospholipids are more sensitive to LA.

    “a general principle is that reagents containing a low concentration of phospholipids are more sensitive to LA [8].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

  • LA detection is based on functional coagulation assays that are characterized by poor standardization, difficulty in interpreting the results, and interference by several drugs commonly used in the clinical setting in which LA search is appropriate.

    “In contrast, LA detection is based on functional coagulation assays that are characterized by poor standardization, difficulty in interpreting the results, and interference by several drugs commonly used in the clinical setting in which LA search is appropriate [8].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripodi, A.
Affiliations
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Corresponding author
Tripodi, Armando
Venue
Biomedicines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-20
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
844
ISSN
2227-9059 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3185090855
Cited by
14
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedicines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, antiphospholipid syndrome, laboratory diagnosis, diagnostic challenges, external quality assessment, test standardization, anticoagulation, thrombosis, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review