Cited by 27Electronic Health Records SystemsEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Efficiency of emergency physicians: insights from an observational study using EHR log files

Open access
Kannampallil, Thomas, Denton, Courtney, Shapiro, Jason, Patel, Vimla·2018·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

Objective With federal mandates and incentives since the turn of this decade, electronic health records (EHR) have been widely adopted and used for clinical care. Over the last several years, we have seen both positive and negative perspectives on its use. Using an analysis of log files of EHR use, we investigated the nature of EHR use and their effect on an emergency department's (ED) throughput and efficiency. Methods EHR logs of time spent by attending physicians on EHR-based activities over a 6-week period (n = 2,304 patients) were collected. For each patient encounter, physician activities in the EHR were categorized into four activities: documentation, review, orders, and navigation. Four ED-based performance metrics were also captured: door-to-provider time, door-to-doctor time, door-to-disposition time, and length of stay (LOS). Association between the four EHR-based activities and corresponding ED performance metrics were evaluated. Results We found positive correlations between physician review of patient charts, and door-to-disposition time (r = 0.43, p < 0.05), and with LOS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant associations between any of the other performance metrics and EHR activities. Conclusion The results highlight that longer time spent on reviewing information on the EHR is potentially associated with decreased ED throughput efficiency. Balancing these competing goals is often a challenge of physicians, and its implications for patient safety is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0037-1621705

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Denton C, Shapiro JS, Nimo G, Kannampallil TG, Patel VL, Eds. Perceived Effects of Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records on Clinical Workflow. AMIA Annual Symposium; 2016; Chicago, IL 32

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kannampallil, T., Denton, C., Shapiro, J., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • New York Academy of Medicine (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2018-01
Volume
09
Issue
01
Pages
099-104
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786131978
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022670)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic health records, emergency department throughput, emergency physicians, length of hospital stay, clinical documentation
MeSH terms
Adult, Documentation, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Longevity, Physicians, Time Factors, Electronic Health Records, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review