Electronic Consultations (eConsults) for safe and equitable coordination of virtual outpatient specialty care
Open accessAbstract
Poor access to timely, high-quality specialty care remains a significant challenge, especially for patients with barriers to health care access, and can result in high rates of preventable morbidity and mortality.[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The health disparities of the COVID-19 pandemic have further underscored the need for improved access to remote specialty care and reduction of in-person visits, especially for vulnerable patients with barriers to care such as uninsured, minority, and rural patients.[ 4 ] [ 5 ] Indeed, the patients most susceptible to adverse outcomes during the pandemic due to higher rates of comorbidities and structural difficulties with social distancing are also those who may face the most barriers in accessing specialty services.[ 5 ] The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a unique set of challenges for the specialty care delivery system, including increased volumes of consultations and referrals to infectious disease and pulmonary specialists for potential COVID-19 cases, as well as an increased need for virtual specialty care access for management of other conditions in particularly at-risk patients.[ 4 ] [ 6 ] Coordination and transition of care between primary and specialty care are of utmost importance at a time when in-person communication may be more fragmented and more patients need timely input from specialists without putting themselves at unnecessary risk of exposure to COVID-19 through in-person visits. While much recent attention has been given to the benefit of live synchronous telehealth video visits especially in the inpatient and emergency department settings,[ 7 ] less attention has been given to the burgeoning role of asynchronous methods such as electronic consultations (eConsults) in outpatient specialty care. eConsults present an additional tool in the growing telehealth armamentarium of technology-facilitated communication modalities for the innovative delivery of patient care.[ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] We believe eConsults are a sustainable solution to improve overall coordination of care between outpatient primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists and ensure safe, timely, and equitable outpatient specialty care. eConsults are a method of asynchronous consultation that facilitates direct communication, typically between PCPs and specialists, over a secure shared electronic platform or electronic health record. Through rapid communication between primary care and specialists, eConsults allow for quick access to specialist input while averting the need for face-to-face in-person or virtual specialty visits, allowing for more cost-effective and convenient care for patients.[ 11 ] [ 12 ] Studies have shown that eConsults can decrease wait times for specialty input by 17.4% and reduce unnecessary specialty in-person visits especially in safety-net health systems, with patient satisfaction rates of 78 to 93% across various sites.[ 13 ] [ 14 ] eConsults also can serve a particular benefit for underserved patients with barriers to specialty care; a study of electronic dermatology consultations showed that eConsults served more nonwhite patients, more Medicaid enrollees, and also decreased the rate of patient no-shows.[ 15 ] In the context of the pandemic, eConsults can serve an even more essential role in helping patients receive safe specialty care and avoid coming to the office for unnecessary visits. eConsults provide a different role from telehealth visits in that they eliminate the time, costs, and resources needed in a direct specialist-to-patient encounter. Over the past several years, the adoption of eConsults has expanded to major public and private health systems across the United States and the rates of adoption and use have increased during the pandemic.[ 16 ] eConsults facilitate transitions between PCPs and specialists through several mechanisms, including improved relationships and communication, education of PCPs on how to manage specialized conditions, increased timeliness and access of care, and standardization of the referral process. First, they improve communication and relationships between PCPs and specialists through ongoing dialogue and education. One study found that over 80% of specialists also felt that eConsults result in improved communication between providers and that specialists appreciated the feedback received from PCPs.[ 17 ] Standardized methods of communication between providers are increasingly important during the pandemic, when there may be additional barriers to in-person interactions due to social distancing measures and a more fragmented workforce as clinicians face shifting duties and redeployment. Second, because PCPs are often asked to perform additional work-up for patients, eConsults transition some specialty care management to PCPs, who can gain increased comfort managing conditions and optimizing preliminary work-up. In addition, the dialogue with specialists can have educational value to PCPs, particularly for trainees and clinician
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
eConsults increase access to specialty care in rural and underserved areas, leading to faster specialist access and improved satisfaction among primary care clinicians.
“They increase access to specialty care in rural and underserved areas, leading to faster specialist access and improved satisfaction among PCCs.7”
From Large Language Model–Generated Electronic Consultations: A Blinded Comparative Study of OpenEvidence and Gastroenterologist Electronic Consultations (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
The main text (page unavailable) reports faster specialist input and reduced waits for patients facing access barriers, including those in safety-net settings. It identifies rural patients as facing barriers, but does not specifically show improved access for rural patients. It also reports higher satisfaction only among clinicians who believe in eConsults’ mission, not a general increase in primary care clinician satisfaction caused by eConsults. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Liddy, C., Drosinis, P., & Keely, E. (2016) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmw024 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Liddy, C., Afkham, A., Drosinis, P., Joschko, J., & Keely, E. (2015) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Barnett, M. L., Yee, H. F., Mehrotra, A., & Giboney, P. (2017) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1283 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- McConnell KJ, Charlesworth CJ, Zhu JM, et al. Access to primary, mental health, and specialty care: a comparison of Medicaid and commercially insured populations in Oregon. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35(01):247-254
- Timbie JW, Kranz AM, Mahmud A, Damberg CL. Specialty care access for Medicaid enrollees in expansion states. Am J Manag Care 2019;25(03):e83-e87
- Cook NL, Hicks LS, O'Malley AJ, Keegan T, Guadagnoli E, Landon BE. Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26(05):1459-1468
- Azar KMJ, Shen Z, Romanelli RJ, et al. Disparities in outcomes among COVID-19 patients in a large health care system In California. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39(07):1253-1262
- Webb Hooper M, Nápoles AM, Pérez-Stable EJ. COVID-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. JAMA 2020;323(24):2466-2467
- Schwamm LH, Erskine A, Licurse A. A digital embrace to blunt the curve of COVID19 pandemic. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:64
- Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID- 19. N Engl J Med 2020;382(18):1679-1681
- Kummer BR, Willey JZ, Zelenetz MJ, et al. Neurological dashboards and consultation turnaround time at an academic medical center. Appl Clin Inform 2019;10(05):849-858
- Lee DJ, Cronin R, Robinson J, et al. Common consumer health-related needs in the pediatric hospital setting: lessons from an engagement consultation service. Appl Clin Inform 2018;9(03):595-603
- Gulacti U, Lok U. Comparison of secure messaging application (WhatsApp) and standard telephone usage for consultations on Length of Stay in the ED. A prospective randomized controlled study. Appl Clin Inform 2017;8(03):742-753
- Snoswell C, Finnane A, Janda M, Soyer HP, Whitty JA. Cost- effectiveness of store-and-forward teledermatology: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152(06):702-708
- Rajda J, Seraly MP, Fernandes J, et al. Impact of direct to consumer store-and-forward teledermatology on access to care, satisfac- tion, utilization, and costs in a commercial health plan popula- tion. Telemed J E Health 2018;24(02):166-169
- Wang RF, Trinidad J, Lawrence J, et al. Improved patient access and outcomes with the integration of an eConsult program (tele- dermatology) within a large academic medical center. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.10.053 · DOI
- Keely E, Williams R, Epstein G, Afkham A, Liddy C. Specialist perspectives on Ontario provincial electronic consultation ser- vices. Telemed J E Health 2019;25(01):3-10 18
- Kwok J, Olayiwola JN, Knox M, Murphy EJ, Tuot DS. Electronic consultation system demonstrates educational benefit for primary care providers. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24(07):465-472
- Olayiwola JN, Anderson D, Jepeal N, et al. Electronic consultations to improve the primary care-specialty care interface for cardiology in the medically underserved: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2016;14(02):133-140
- Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, et al. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health 2004;10(04):422-431
- Lee MS, Ray KN, Mehrotra A, Giboney P, Yee HF Jr, Barnett ML. Primary care practitioners' perceptions of electronic consult systems: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178(06): 782-789
- Lee MS, Nambudiri V. Integrating telemedicine into training: adding value to graduate medical education through electronic consultations. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11(03):251-254
- Hartzband P, Groopman J. Physician burnout, interrupted. N Engl J Med 2020;382(26):2485-2487
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stephenson, C. R., Varayil, J. E., Salonen, B. R., Wight, E. C., Sang, P. D., Ghosh, A. K., Shung, D. L., Croghan, I. T., Schroeder, D. R., & Hurt, R. T. (2026) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2026.100404
- Authors
- Lee, M. S., & Nambudiri, V. E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Michelle S.
- Venue
- Applied Clinical Informatics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 821-824
- ISSN
- 1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7725593
- OpenAlex
- W3112886753
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- e-consultation, telemedicine, care transitions, asynchronous telehealth, health disparities, COVID-19 pandemic, access to specialist care, health equity, safety-net health system, patient satisfaction, uninsured patients, electronic health records
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Outpatients, Referral and Consultation, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review