Cited by 140Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers

Open access
Liddy, C., Afkham, A., Drosinis, P., Joschko, J., Keely, E.·2015·The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We have improved access to specialist care and decreased wait times in our region through the development and implementation of the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) service. This secure, web-based tool allows primary care providers (PCPs) quick access to specialist advice for their patients and often helps to avoid the need for a face-to-face referral. Our successful implementation of eConsult in our region provides a unique opportunity to examine PCPs' satisfaction and overall perspective on using the service. METHODS: Following the closure of each case, PCPs completed a short survey with multiple-choice and open-ended questions regarding the eConsult. All eConsults submitted between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013, were analyzed. We calculated satisfaction scores from the survey and conducted a constant-comparison thematic analysis on those cases where the PCP elected to leave a text response. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,052 eConsults completed during the study period. In 91% and 93% of eConsults, PCPs reported a high value for their patients and themselves, respectively. In 554 eConsults, PCPs elected to leave a written response. Three major themes emerged: PCP appreciation of the eConsult service, perceived benefits for the quality of patient care, and attitudes towards using a new health technology. High satisfaction was expressed with quick response times, helpfulness of responses, and reassurance reported. Most PCPs felt eConsult had a positive impact on patient care by also providing reassurance to patients, reducing burden of time and travel, and offering educational opportunities to PCPs applicable to future cases. CONCLUSION: PCPs showed a high level of satisfaction with eConsult's quick turnaround time and quality of specialist advice. Our results illustrate the advantages of using asynchronous virtual platforms to increase access to specialty care from a PCP perspective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other eConsult services are independent of individual health records and use secure web-based portals to link providers, such as Champlain BASE, TNMG, and KSYOS, or harness secure intranet e-mail such as AKO.

    “Other eConsult services are independent of individual health records and use a secure web-based portals to link providers, such as the Champlain BASE in Canada, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] TNMG in Brazil, [33][34][35][36] and KSYOS in The Netherlands, 37 or harness secure intranet e-mail as the means of communication, such as Army Knowledge Online (AKO).38”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]4. Liddy C, Rowan MS, Afkham A, Maranger J, Keely E. Building access to specialist care through e-con- sultation. Open Med 2013;7:e1-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liddy, C., Afkham, A., Drosinis, P., Joschko, J., & Keely, E.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
394-403
ISSN
  • 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7118
OpenAlex
W2114857658
Cited by
140
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
38.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Champlain Local Health Integration Network
  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-consultation, access to specialist care, specialist referral, waiting time, health technology adoption, quality of care
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Medical Informatics Applications, Ontario, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review