The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic and Surgical Therapy for Chronic Pancreatitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Invasive treatment for abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis may be either surgical or endoscopic, particularly in cases of ductal obstruction. To date, the data published on the effectiveness of these two forms of therapy have been mostly retrospective, and there have been no randomized studies. A prospective, randomized study comparing surgery with endoscopy in patients with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis was therefore conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with pancreatic duct obstruction and pain were invited to participate in a randomized trial comparing endotherapy and surgery, the latter consisting of resection and drainage procedures, depending on the patient's individual situation. Patients who did not agree to participation and randomization were also further assessed using the same follow-up protocol. RESULTS: Of 140 eligible patients, only 72 agreed to be randomized. Surgery consisted of resection (80 %) and drainage (20 %) procedures, while endotherapy included sphincterotomy and stenting (52 %) and/or stone removal (23 %). In the entire group, the initial success rates were similar for both groups, but at the 5-year follow-up, complete absence of pain was more frequent after surgery (37 % vs. 14 %), with the rate of partial relief being similar (49 % vs. 51 %). In the randomized subgroup, results were similar (pain absence 34 % after surgery vs. 15 % after endotherapy, relief 52 % after surgery vs. 46 % after endotherapy). The increase in body weight was also greater by 20 - 25 % in the surgical group, while new-onset diabetes developed with similar frequency in both groups (34 - 43 %), again with no differences between the results for the whole group and the randomized subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is superior to endotherapy for long-term pain reduction in patients with painful obstructive chronic pancreatitis. Better selection of patients for endotherapy may be helpful in order to maximize results. Due to its low degree of invasiveness, however, endotherapy can be offered as a first-line treatment, with surgery being performed in case of failure and/or recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review
Singh, V. K., Yadav, D., & Garg, P. K. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.19411 · Cited by 486
Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis
Drewes, A. M., Bouwense, S. A. W., Campbell, C. M., Ceyhan, G. O., Delhaye, M., Demir, I. E., Garg, P. K., van Goor, H., Halloran, C., Isaji, S., et al. (2017) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.006 · Cited by 321
Issa, Y., Kempeneers, M. A., Bruno, M. J., Fockens, P., Poley, J.-W., Ahmed Ali, U., Bollen, T. L., Busch, O. R., Dejong, C. H., van Duijvendijk, P., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20967 · Cited by 261
Management of chronic pancreatitis
Hines, O. J., & Pandol, S. J. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-070920 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 553-558
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W1480568359
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic and Surgical Therapy for Chronic Pancreatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2003-40237
- The paper
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic and Surgical Therapy for Chronic Pancreatitis. (2003). Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.