Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychologic and Social Precursors of Coronary Disease: (Second of Two Parts)

Jenkins, C. David·1971·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Life DissatisfactionsStudies from several countries agree that patients with coronary disease are particularly apt to report dissatisfactions in many areas of their lives. Blohmke and her colleagues compared men in five categories of coronary disease with a control population.92 One or more of the categories were distinguished from controls by each of the following variables: tedious work, vocational difficulties in the past 10 years, and feeling of being ill at ease at place of work. In each case of a significant difference, the groups with coronary disease more often reported the job dissatisfaction. Bruhn et al., in a study . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197102112840607

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, C. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1971-02-11
Volume
284
Issue
6
Pages
307-317
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1999940014
Cited by
330
References
0
FWCI
19.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychologic and Social Precursors of Coronary Disease: (Second of Two Parts). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197102112840607
The paper
Jenkins, C. D. (1971). Psychologic and Social Precursors of Coronary Disease: (Second of Two Parts). New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197102112840607

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.