The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intranasal Aerosolized Insulin: Mixed-Meal Studies and Long-Term Use in Type I Diabetes
Abstract
We assessed the efficacy of intranasal aerosolized insulin containing laureth-9 as a surfactant in patients with Type I diabetes by fasting studies in 8 patients, mixed-meal studies in 15, and long-term home use in 8. The intranasal insulin (1 U per kilogram of body weight in 1 per cent laureth-9) was rapidly absorbed (in 15 minutes); it lowered the plasma glucose level by 50 per cent in 45 minutes in fasting normal controls and by 50 per cent in 120 minutes in fasting diabetics. The glucose-lowering potency depended on the insulin dose and surfactant concentration. Nasal irritation was proportional to surfactant concentration, with great variability among subjects. After intranasal insulin used before meals (1 U per kilogram in 1 per cent laureth-9), the two-hour postprandial glucose level increased above before-meal levels by 38 mg per deciliter, as compared with 191 mg per deciliter after intranasal placebo in patients with Type I diabetes (P less than 0.05). An outpatient feasibility study examining three months of use of intranasal aerosolized insulin before meals as a supplement to Ultralente insulin revealed that the aerosol was well tolerated, with glycemic control (as indicated by the percentage of glycohemoglobin, home glucose measurements, and hypoglycemic reactions) comparable to that during a subsequent three-month period of conventional subcutaneous insulin treatment. The results suggest that intranasal insulin has potential as an adjunct to subcutaneous insulin in the therapy of Type I diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galloway, J. A., Spradlin, C. T., Nelson, R. L., Wentworth, S. M., Davidson, J. A., & Swarner, J. L. (1981) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.4.3.366 · Cited by 226
Cited by
A New Approach to the Oral Administration of Insulin and Other Peptide Drugs
Saffran, M., Kumar, G. S., Savariar, C., Burnham, J. C., Williams, F., & Neckers, D. C. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3526553 · Cited by 469
Nasal route and drug delivery systems
Türker, S., Onur, E., & Ózer, Y. (2004) · Pharmacy World & Science · doi:10.1023/b:phar.0000026823.82950.ff · Cited by 354
McMartin, C., Hutchinson, L. E. F., Hyde, R., & Peters, G. E. (1987) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600760709 · Cited by 349
Alternative routes of insulin delivery
Owens, D. R., Zinman, B., & Bolli, G. (2003) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01076.x · Cited by 332
Insulin delivery methods: Past, present and future
Shah, R., Shah, V., Patel, M., & Maahs, D. (2016) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation · doi:10.4103/2230-973x.176456 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Salzman, R., Manson, J. E., Griffing, G. T., Kimmerle, R., Ruderman, N., McCall, A., Stoltz, E. I., Mullin, C., Small, D., Armstrong, J., & Melby, J. C.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1985-04-25
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1078-1084
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2049765266
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intranasal Aerosolized Insulin: Mixed-Meal Studies and Long-Term Use in Type I Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198504253121702
- The paper
- Salzman, R., Manson, J. E., Griffing, G. T., Kimmerle, R., Ruderman, N., McCall, A., Stoltz, E. I., Mullin, C., Small, D., Armstrong, J., & Melby, J. C. (1985). Intranasal Aerosolized Insulin: Mixed-Meal Studies and Long-Term Use in Type I Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198504253121702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.