The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibody to Cardiolipin as a Predictor of Fetal Distress or Death in Pregnant Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Abstract
During a prospective study of pregnancies in women with systemic lupus erythematosus, we examined the relation between antibody to cardiolipin, measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and midpregnancy fetal distress, identified by abnormal results of antepartum fetal heart-rate testing or by fetal death. All of nine patients with lupus and this complication had abnormally high antibody levels (mean, 212.3 +/- 55.3 units), as compared with values in normal nonpregnant women (28.2 +/- 10.1 units). None of 12 pregnant patients with lupus but without this complication had antibody levels above 50 units (mean, 27.5 +/- 3.4 units; P less than 0.005 vs. women with lupus and fetal distress); 4 of 12 pregnant subjects without lupus had antibody levels above 50 units (mean, 42.5 +/- 11.0), and fetal death occurred in the subject with the highest level. The mean antibody level in 12 nonpregnant patients with lupus was 117.4 +/- 35.0 units. Two patients who had lupus anticoagulant but not clinical lupus, both with histories of prior fetal death, also had high antibody levels; fetal death occurred in one, and spontaneous fetal bradycardia in the other. Antibody to cardiolipin was loosely linked to a history, but not the simultaneous presence, of demonstrable lupus anticoagulant or thrombocytopenia, and could be detected as early in pregnancy as either anticoagulant or thrombocytopenia. We conclude that measurement of antibody to cardiolipin is the most sensitive assay to predict fetal distress or death in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and may be of pathogenetic importance in this syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boey, M. L., Colaco, C. B., Gharavi, A. E., Elkon, K. B., Loizou, S., & Hughes, G. R. (1983) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.287.6398.1021 · Cited by 508
Kelsey, P. R., Stevenson, K. J., & Poller, L. (1984) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1661166 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Levine, J. S., Branch, D. W., & Rauch, J. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra002974 · Cited by 1,543
VTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy
Bates, S. M., Greer, I. A., Middeldorp, S., Veenstra, D. L., Prabulos, A.-M., & Vandvik, P. O. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2300 · Cited by 1,525
Antiphospholipid thrombosis: clinical course after the first thrombotic event in 70 patients
Rosove, M. H., & Brewer, P. M. C. (1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-4-303 · Cited by 700
Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies
McNeil, H. P., Chesterman, C. N., & Krilis, S. A. (1991) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60777-4 · Cited by 481
The use of the dilute Russell viper venom time for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants
Thiagarajan, P., Pengo, V, & Shapiro, S. (1986) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v68.4.869.869 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockshin, M. D., Druzin, M. L., Goei, S., Qamar, T., Magid, M. S., Jovanovic, L., & Ferenc, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1985-07-18
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 152-156
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2339577007
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody to Cardiolipin as a Predictor of Fetal Distress or Death in Pregnant Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198507183130304
- The paper
- Lockshin, M. D., Druzin, M. L., Goei, S., Qamar, T., Magid, M. S., Jovanovic, L., & Ferenc, M. (1985). Antibody to Cardiolipin as a Predictor of Fetal Distress or Death in Pregnant Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198507183130304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.