Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leukemia Following Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Kaldor, John M., Day, Nicholas E., Pettersson, Folke, Clarke, E. Aileen, Pedersen, Dorthe, Mehnert, Wolf, Bell, Janine, Høst, Herman, Prior, Patricia, Karjalainen, Sakari, Neal, Frank, Koch, Maria, Band, Pierre, Choi, Won, Kirn, Vera Pompe, Arslan, Annie, Zarén, Birgitta, Belch, A.R., Storm, Hans, Kittelmann, Bernd, Fraser, Patricia, Stovall, Marilyn·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

An international collaborative group of cancer registries and hospitals identified 114 cases of leukemia following ovarian cancer. We investigated the possible etiologic role of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and other factors, using a case-control study design, with three controls matched to each case of leukemia. Chemotherapy alone was associated with a relative risk of 12 (95 percent confidence interval, 4.4 to 32), as compared with surgery alone, and patients treated with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy had a relative risk of 10 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.4 to 28). Radiotherapy alone did not produce a significant increase in risk as compared with surgery alone. The risk of leukemia was greatest four or five years after chemotherapy began, and the risk was elevated for at least eight years after the cessation of chemotherapy. The drugs cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, melphalan, thiotepa, and treosulfan were independently associated with significantly increased risks of leukemia, as was the combination of doxorubicin hydrochloride and cisplatin. Chlorambucil and melphalan were the most leukemogenic drugs, followed by thiotepa; cyclophosphamide and treosulfan were the weakest leukemogens, and the effect per gram was substantially lower at high doses than at lower doses. The extent to which the relative risks of leukemia are offset by differences in chemotherapeutic effectiveness is not known.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199001043220101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Kaldor, J. M., Day, N. E., Pettersson, F., Clarke, E. A., Pedersen, D., Mehnert, W., Bell, J., Høst, H., Prior, P., Karjalainen, S., Neal, F., Koch, M., Band, P., Choi, W., Kirn, V. P., Arslan, A., Zarén, B., Belch, A. R., Storm, H., Kittelmann, B., Fraser, P., & Stovall, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-01-04
Volume
322
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2611745499
Cited by
279
References
1
FWCI
23.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leukemia Following Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199001043220101
The paper
Kaldor, J. M., Day, N. E., Pettersson, F., Clarke, E. A., Pedersen, D., Mehnert, W., Bell, J., Høst, H., Prior, P., Karjalainen, S., Neal, F., Koch, M., Band, P., Choi, W., Kirn, V. P., Arslan, A., Zarén, B., Belch, A. R., Storm, H., . . . Stovall, M. (1990). Leukemia Following Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199001043220101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.