Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 617

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Platelet Hyperreactivity and Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction

Open access
Trip, Mieke D., Cats, Volkert Manger, van Capelle, Frans J.L., Vreeken, Johan·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that an increase in spontaneous aggregability of platelets in vitro predicts mortality and coronary events in patients who have survived a recent myocardial infarction. A cohort of 149 survivors of infarction entered our study three months after the index infarction and was followed for five years. At entry and at intervals of six months, spontaneous platelet aggregation (SPA) was tested and graded as positive (aggregation within 10 minutes), intermediate (aggregation after 10 to 20 minutes), or negative (no aggregation within 20 minutes). During follow-up, 6.4 percent (6 of 94) of the patients in the SPA-negative group died, as compared with 10.3 percent (3 of 29) in the SPA-intermediate group and 34.6 percent (9 of 26) in the SPA-positive group. As compared with the SPA-negative group, the SPA-intermediate group had a relative risk of death of 1.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 5.5) and the SPA-positive group had a risk of 5.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.2 to 13.4). At least one cardiac event (cardiac death or recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction) occurred in 14.9 percent (14 of 94 patients) of the SPA-negative group, 24.1 percent (7 of 29) of the SPA-intermediate group, and 46.2 percent (12 of 26) of the SPA-positive group. A positive test result continued to have prognostic value throughout the five-year study. We conclude that spontaneous platelet aggregation in vitro is a useful biologic marker for the prediction of coronary events and mortality in this low-risk group of survivors of a myocardial infarction. A causal relation is suggested but not proved by our study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199005313222201

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Trip, M. D., Cats, V. M., van Capelle, F. J. L., & Vreeken, J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-05-31
Volume
322
Issue
22
Pages
1549-1554
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2046367794
Cited by
617
References
2
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platelet Hyperreactivity and Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199005313222201
The paper
Trip, M. D., Cats, V. M., van Capelle, F. J. L., & Vreeken, J. (1990). Platelet Hyperreactivity and Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199005313222201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.