The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Phenytoin for the Prevention of Post-Traumatic Seizures
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs are commonly used to prevent seizures that may follow head trauma. However, previous controlled studies of this practice have been inconclusive. METHODS: To study further the effectiveness of phenytoin (Dilantin) in preventing post-traumatic seizures, we randomly assigned 404 eligible patients with serious head trauma to treatment with phenytoin (n = 208) or placebo (n = 196) for one year in a double-blind fashion. An intravenous loading dose was given within 24 hours of injury. Serum levels of phenytoin were maintained in the high therapeutic range (3 to 6 mumol of free phenytoin per liter). Follow-up was continued for two years. The primary data analysis was performed according to the intention to treat. RESULTS: Between drug loading and day 7, 3.6 percent of the patients assigned to phenytoin had seizures, as compared with 14.2 percent of patients assigned to placebo (P less than 0.001; risk ratio, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.62). Between day 8 and the end of year 1, 21.5 percent of the phenytoin group and 15.7 percent of the placebo group had seizures; at the end of year 2, the rates were 27.5 percent and 21.1 percent, respectively (P greater than 0.2 for each comparison; risk ratio, 1.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 2.02). This lack of a late effect could not be attributed to differential mortality, low phenytoin levels, or treatment of some early seizures in patients assigned to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Phenytoin exerts a beneficial effect by reducing seizures only during the first week after severe head injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
Blood–brain barrier breakdown as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury
Shlosberg, D., Benifla, M., Kaufer, D., & Friedman, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.74 · Cited by 897
Dikmen, S. S., Machamer, J. E., Powell, J. M., & Temkin, N. R. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00287-9 · Cited by 457
Self-citationWong, M. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02341.x · Cited by 205
Rathlev, N. K., Ulrich, A. S., Delanty, N., & D’Onofrio, G. (2006) · The Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.09.012 · Cited by 94
Gruenbaum, S. E., Zlotnik, A., Gruenbaum, B. F., Hersey, D., & Bilotta, F. (2016) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-016-0355-2 · Cited by 86
“Although phenytoin has historically been the agent of choice for post-TBI seizure prophylaxis [49], levetiracetam”
BackgroundHuman clinical trails in antiepileptogenesis
Mani, R., Pollard, J., & Dichter, M. A. (2011) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.010 · Cited by 51
Clinical Approach to Posttraumatic Epilepsy
Parko, K., & Rao, V. (2015) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1544239 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Temkin, N. R., Dikmen, S. S., Wilensky, A. J., Keihm, J., Chabal, S., & Winn, H. R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1990-08-23
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 497-502
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2325851205
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.