Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 785

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of a β2-Agonist, Terbutaline, with an Inhaled Corticosteroid, Budesonide, in Newly Detected Asthma

Open access
Haahtela, Tari, Järvinen, Markku, Kava, Tuomo, Kiviranta, Kirsti, Koskinen, Sirkka, Lehtonen, Kaarina, Nikander, Kurt, Persson, Tore, Reinikainen, Kaija, Selroos, Olof, Sovijärvi, Anssi, Stenius-Aarniala, Brita, Svahn, Thore, Tammivaara, Ritva, Laitinen, Lauri A.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of airway inflammation even in mild asthma points to the potential value of antiinflammatory therapy. We compared the effect of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, with that of an inhaled beta 2-agonist, terbutaline, in the long-term treatment of newly detected asthma. METHODS: We studied 103 patients (29 male and 74 female patients 15 to 64 years old) in whom asthma had appeared within the previous year. The patients were randomly assigned in blinded fashion to two treatment groups: one to receive 600 micrograms of inhaled budesonide twice a day, and the other to receive 375 micrograms of inhaled terbutaline twice a day. The study period was two years. RESULTS: After six weeks of treatment, the patients treated with budesonide tolerated inhaled histamine better than the patients treated with terbutaline (a difference of one doubling dose step, P less than 0.001), and the difference was sustained. Patients' diaries kept during the first three months of the study and during the last month of the first and second years showed budesonide to be more effective than terbutaline in improving peak expiratory flow in the morning (average increase from the pretreatment value, 32.8 liters per minute for budesonide vs. 4.8 liters per minute for terbutaline; P less than 0.001) and in the evening (P less than 0.01). Budesonide was also more effective in reducing the symptoms of asthma (P less than 0.01) and the use of supplemental beta 2-agonist medication (P less than 0.01). Ten patients were withdrawn from the terbutaline group because treatment was insufficiently effective, whereas only one dropped out of the budesonide group. The adverse reactions to both treatments were few and mild. CONCLUSIONS: Antiinflammatory therapy with inhaled budesonide is an effective first-line treatment for patients with newly detected, mild asthma, and it is superior to the use of terbutaline in such patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199108083250603

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 785

Metadata

Authors
Haahtela, T., Järvinen, M., Kava, T., Kiviranta, K., Koskinen, S., Lehtonen, K., Nikander, K., Persson, T., Reinikainen, K., Selroos, O., Sovijärvi, A., Stenius-Aarniala, B., Svahn, T., Tammivaara, R., & Laitinen, L. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-08-08
Volume
325
Issue
6
Pages
388-392
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2331642892
Cited by
785
References
12
FWCI
26.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of a β2-Agonist, Terbutaline, with an Inhaled Corticosteroid, Budesonide, in Newly Detected Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199108083250603
The paper
Haahtela, T., Järvinen, M., Kava, T., Kiviranta, K., Koskinen, S., Lehtonen, K., Nikander, K., Persson, T., Reinikainen, K., Selroos, O., Sovijärvi, A., Stenius-Aarniala, B., Svahn, T., Tammivaara, R., & Laitinen, L. A. (1991). Comparison of a β2-Agonist, Terbutaline, with an Inhaled Corticosteroid, Budesonide, in Newly Detected Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199108083250603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.