Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 837

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Open access
Mark, Daniel B., Shaw, Linda, Harrell, Frank E., Hlatky, Mark A., Lee, Kerry L., Bengtson, James R., McCants, Charles B., Califf, Robert M., Pryor, David B.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treadmill exercise test identifies patients with different degrees of risk of death from cardiovascular events. We devised a prognostic score, based on the results of treadmill exercise testing, that accurately predicts outcome among inpatients referred for cardiac catheterization. This study was designed to determine whether this score could also accurately predict prognosis in unselected outpatients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 613 consecutive outpatients with suspected coronary disease who were referred for exercise testing between 1983 and 1985. Follow-up was 98 percent complete at four years. The treadmill score was calculated as follows: duration of exercise in minutes--(5 x the maximal ST-segment deviation during or after exercise, in millimeters)--(4 x the treadmill angina index). The numerical treadmill angina index was 0 for no angina, 1 for nonlimiting angina, and 2 for exercise-limiting angina. Treadmill scores ranged from -25 (indicating the highest risk) to +15 (indicating the lowest risk). RESULTS: Predicted outcomes for the outpatients, based on their treadmill scores, agreed closely with the observed outcomes. The score accurately separated patients who subsequently died from those who lived for four years (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.849). The treadmill score was a better discriminator than the clinical data and was even more useful for outpatients than it had been for inpatients. Approximately two thirds of the outpatients had treadmill scores indicating low risk (greater than or equal to +5), reflecting longer exercise times and little or no ST-segment deviation, and their four-year survival rate was 99 percent (average annual mortality rate, 0.25 percent). Four percent of the outpatients had scores indicating high risk (less than -10), reflecting shorter exercise times and more severe ST-segment deviation; their four-year survival rate was 79 percent (average annual mortality rate, 5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The treadmill score is a useful and valid tool that can help clinicians determine prognosis and decide whether to refer outpatients with suspected coronary disease for cardiac catheterization. In this study, it was a better predictor of outcome than the clinical assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199109193251204

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 837

Metadata

Authors
Mark, D. B., Shaw, L., Harrell, F. E., Hlatky, M. A., Lee, K. L., Bengtson, J. R., McCants, C. B., Califf, R. M., & Pryor, D. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-09-19
Volume
325
Issue
12
Pages
849-853
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2342311534
Cited by
837
References
2
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199109193251204
The paper
Mark, D. B., Shaw, L., Harrell, F. E., Hlatky, M. A., Lee, K. L., Bengtson, J. R., McCants, C. B., Califf, R. M., & Pryor, D. B. (1991). Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Outpatients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199109193251204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.