Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Provirus in Mononuclear Cells by in Situ Polymerase Chain Reaction

Bagasra, Omar, Hauptman, Stephen P., Lischner, Harold W., Sachs, Mark, Pomerantz, Roger J.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have attempted to quantitate the viral load correlate it with the degree of immune deficiency. In one study, only about 1 in 10,000 peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) expressed HIV-1, but in other studies, at least 1 in 100 CD4-positive cells was infected and harbored the HIV-1 provirus. METHODS: We developed a new, highly sensitive in situ polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) method that amplifies selected genetic regions within intact single cells. We used this technique to determine the proportion of PBMC carrying HIV-1 provirus in infected patients in different stages of disease. RESULTS: None of the PBMC from 11 HIV-1--seronegative patients were found to be positive for HIV-1 provirus by the in situ PCR method. In 56 patients infected with HIV-1, the percentage of PBMC with HIV-1 ranged from 0.1 percent to 13.5 percent. The mean percentage of infected mononuclear cells was greater in 13 patients with persistent generalized adenopathy (mean, 6.6 percent) and 19 with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (Stages IV-A to IV-C) (4.6 percent) than in 19 patients with asymptomatic HIV-1 infection (0.9 percent) (P less than 0.001). However, in five patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (Stage IV-D), an average of only 1.6 percent of mononuclear cells were infected. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-1 infection, the proportion of PBMC that are infected appears to be at least 10 times higher than previously described. It is likely that most infected cells contain HIV-1 provirus in a latent or defective form that was not detected in some earlier studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199205213262103

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Bagasra, O., Hauptman, S. P., Lischner, H. W., Sachs, M., & Pomerantz, R. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-05-21
Volume
326
Issue
21
Pages
1385-1391
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2329291112
Cited by
300
References
39
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Provirus in Mononuclear Cells by in Situ Polymerase Chain Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199205213262103
The paper
Bagasra, O., Hauptman, S. P., Lischner, H. W., Sachs, M., & Pomerantz, R. J. (1992). Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Provirus in Mononuclear Cells by in Situ Polymerase Chain Reaction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199205213262103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.