The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Tocopherol and Deprenyl on the Progression of Disability in Early Parkinson's Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In 1987 we began a multicenter controlled clinical trial of deprenyl (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor) and tocopherol (a component of vitamin E that traps free radicals) in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease. We randomly assigned 800 patients to one of four treatments: placebo, active tocopherol and deprenyl placebo, active deprenyl and tocopherol placebo, or both active drugs. The primary end point was the onset of disability prompting the clinical decision to begin administering levodopa. An interim analysis showed that deprenyl was beneficial (N Engl J Med 1989;321:1364-71). We report the results of tocopherol treatment after a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 14 +/- 6 months, as well as the follow-up results for deprenyl. RESULTS: There was no beneficial effect of tocopherol or any interaction between tocopherol and deprenyl. The beneficial effects of deprenyl, which occurred largely during the first 12 months of treatment, remained strong and significantly delayed the onset of disability requiring levodopa therapy (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.62; P < 0.001). The difference in the estimated median time to the end point was about nine months. The ratings for Parkinson's disease improved during the first three months of deprenyl treatment; the motor performance of deprenyl-treated patients worsened after the treatments were withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: Deprenyl (10 mg per day) but not tocopherol (2000 IU per day) delays the onset of disability associated with early, otherwise untreated Parkinson's disease. The action of deprenyl that accounts for its beneficial effects remains unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Cited by
Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing
Finkel, T., & Holbrook, N. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35041687 · Cited by 9,413
Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress
Barnham, K. J., Masters, C. L., & Bush, A. I. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1330 · Cited by 3,683
A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease
Sano, M., Ernesto, C., Thomas, R. G., Klauber, M. R., Schafer, K., Grundman, M., Woodbury, P., Growdon, J., Cotman, C. W., Pfeiffer, E., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704243361704 · Cited by 2,380
Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: Cause or consequence?
Andersen, J. K. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nrn1434 · Cited by 1,869
Halliwell, B. (2001) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200118090-00004 · Cited by 1,502
Metadata
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-01-21
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 176-183
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2301404923
- Cited by
- 1,221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Tocopherol and Deprenyl on the Progression of Disability in Early Parkinson's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199301213280305
- The paper
- Effects of Tocopherol and Deprenyl on the Progression of Disability in Early Parkinson's Disease. (1993). New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199301213280305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.