The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Magnesium Sulfate with Phenytoin for the Prevention of Eclampsia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulfate is used widely to prevent eclamptic seizures in pregnant women with hypertension, but few studies have compared the efficacy of magnesium sulfate with that of other drugs. Anticonvulsant prophylaxis with phenytoin for eclampsia has been recommended, but there are virtually no data to support its efficacy. Our objective was to compare magnesium sulfate with phenytoin in preventing seizures in hypertensive women during labor. METHODS: We randomly assigned women with hypertension who were admitted for delivery to receive either magnesium sulfate or phenytoin. The magnesium sulfate regimen consisted of a 10-g intramuscular loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 5 g given intramuscularly every four hours. For women with severe preeclampsia, an additional 4-g loading dose was given intravenously. The phenytoin regimen included a 1000-mg loading dose infused over a period of 1 hour, followed by a 500-mg oral dose 10 hours later. With either regimen, anticonvulsant therapy was continued for 24 hours post partum. RESULTS: Ten of 1089 women randomly assigned to the phenytoin regimen had eclamptic convulsions, as compared with none of 1049 women randomly assigned to magnesium sulfate (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in any risk factors for eclampsia between the two study groups. Maternal and infant outcomes were also similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium sulfate is superior to phenytoin for the prevention of eclampsia in hypertensive pregnant women. These results validate the long-practiced use of magnesium sulfate in the prevention of eclampsia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107928 · Cited by 3,270
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Saris, N.-E. L., Mervaala, E., Karppanen, H., Khawaja, J. A., & Lewenstam, A. (2000) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0009-8981(99)00258-2 · Cited by 1,366
Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications
Burton, G. J., Redman, C. W., Roberts, J. M., & Moffett, A. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l2381 · Cited by 1,250
Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines
Phipps, E., Prasanna, D., Brima, W., & Jim, B. (2016) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.12081115 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucas, M. J., Leveno, K. J., & Cunningham, F. G.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-07-27
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 201-205
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2315409533
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Magnesium Sulfate with Phenytoin for the Prevention of Eclampsia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199507273330401
- The paper
- Lucas, M. J., Leveno, K. J., & Cunningham, F. G. (1995). A Comparison of Magnesium Sulfate with Phenytoin for the Prevention of Eclampsia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199507273330401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.