The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tuberculosis in New York City — Turning the Tide
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From 1978 through 1992, the number of patients with tuberculosis in New York City nearly tripled, and the proportion of such patients who had drug-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis more than doubled. METHODS: We reviewed, confirmed, and analyzed data obtained during the surveillance of patients with tuberculosis. RESULTS: From 1992 through 1994, there was a 21 percent decrease in reported cases of tuberculosis in New York City. An evaluation of the surveillance system revealed very few unreported cases. The number of cases decreased by more than 20 percent among blacks and Hispanics, persons with documented human immunodeficiency virus infection, homeless persons, and patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; in all these groups, tuberculosis is likely to result from recent transmission. In contrast, the number of cases of tuberculosis increased among elderly and foreign-born persons, in whom the disease is likely to result from the reactivation of an infection acquired many years earlier. Enrollment in a program of directly observed therapy, in which health workers watch patients take their medications, increased from fewer than 100 patients to nearly 1300, with more than 32,000 patient-months of observation from 1992 through 1994. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiologic patterns strongly suggest that the decrease in cases resulted from an interruption in the ongoing spread of M. tuberculosis infection, primarily because of better rates of completion of treatment and expanded use of directly observed therapy. Another contributing factor may have been efforts to reduce the spread of tuberculosis in institutional settings, such as hospitals, shelters, and jails. Expansion of measures to prevent and control tuberculosis and support of international control efforts are needed to ensure continued progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Growing Burden of Tuberculosis: Global Trends and Interactions With the HIV Epidemic
Corbett, E. L., Watt, C. J., Walker, N., Maher, D., Williams, B. G., Raviglione, M. C., & Dye, C. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.9.1009 · Cited by 2,553
Pai, M., Behr, M. A., Dowdy, D., Dheda, K., Divangahi, M., Boehme, C. C., Ginsberg, A., Swaminathan, S., Spigelman, M., Getahun, H., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.76 · Cited by 1,270
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis and Molecular Determinants of Virulence
Smith, I. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.463-496.2003 · Cited by 1,154
Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
Seung, K. J., Keshavjee, S., & Rich, M. L. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017863 · Cited by 805
HIV and Tuberculosis: a Deadly Human Syndemic
Kwan, C. K., & Ernst, J. D. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-10 · Cited by 720
Metadata
- Authors
- Frieden, T. R., Fujiwara, P. I., Washko, R. M., & Hamburg, M. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-07-27
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 229-233
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2331082576
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuberculosis in New York City — Turning the Tide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199507273330406
- The paper
- Frieden, T. R., Fujiwara, P. I., Washko, R. M., & Hamburg, M. A. (1995). Tuberculosis in New York City — Turning the Tide. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199507273330406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.