The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differing Birth Weight among Infants of U.S.-Born Blacks, African-Born Blacks, and U.S.-Born Whites
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, the birth weights of infants of black women are lower than those of infants of white women. The extent to which the lower birth weights among blacks are related to social or genetic factors is unclear. METHODS: We used vital records for 1980 through 1995 from Illinois to determine the distribution of birth weights among infants born to three groups of women -- U.S.-born blacks, African-born blacks, and U.S.-born whites. RESULTS: The mean birth weight of 44,046 infants of U.S.-born white women was 3446 g, that of 3135 infants of African-born black women was 3333 g, and that of 43,322 infants of U.S.-born black women was 3089 g. The incidence of low birth weight (weight less than 2500 g) was 13.2 percent among infants of U.S.-born black women and 7.1 percent among infants of African-born black women, as compared with 4.3 percent among infants of U.S.-born white women (relative risks, 3.1 and 1.6, respectively). Among the women at lowest risk (those 20 to 39 years old, with 12 years of education for themselves and their spouses, early prenatal care, gravida 2 or 3, and no previous fetal loss), the rate of low birth weight in infants of African-born black women (3.6 percent) was closer to the rate in infants of U.S.-born white women (2.4 percent), and the rate in infants of U.S.-born black women remained high (7.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The birth-weight patterns of infants of African-born black women and U.S.-born white women are more closely related to one another than to the birth weights of infants of U.S.-born black women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis.
Youkeles, L., & Schlesselman, J. J. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288156 · Cited by 2,346
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 1,389
Racism, Sexism, and Social Class: Implications for Studies of Health, Disease, and Well-being
Krieger, N., Rowley, D. L., Herman, A. A., Avery, B., & Phillips, M. T. (1993) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30666-4 · Cited by 956
The Medicalization of Race: Scientific Legitimization of a Flawed Social Construct
Witzig, R. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00008 · Cited by 389
Racial Differences in Low Birth Weight
Kleinman, J. C., & Kessel, S. S. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198709173171207 · Cited by 373
Reed, T. E. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.762 · Cited by 319
EMANUEL, I., FILAKTI, H., ALBERMAN, E., & EVANS, S. J. W. (1992) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14396.x · Cited by 232
Risk Factors Accounting for Racial Differences in the Rate of Premature Birth
Lieberman, E., Ryan, K. J., Monson, R. R., & Schoenbaum, S. C. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198709173171206 · Cited by 208
A note on the biologic concept of race and its application in epidemiologic research
Cooper, R. (1984) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/0002-8703(84)90662-8 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Socio‐economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?
Kramer, M. S., Séguin, L., Lydon, J., & Goulet, L. (2000) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x · Cited by 828
Kuzawa, C. W., & Sweet, E. (2009) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.20822 · Cited by 701
Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants
Bryant, A. S., Worjoloh, A., Caughey, A. B., & Washington, A. E. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864 · Cited by 654
How race becomes biology: Embodiment of social inequality
Gravlee, C. C. (2009) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20983 · Cited by 625
RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH: Models to Explain Health Disparities
Dressler, W. W., Oths, K. S., & Gravlee, C. C. (2005) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120505 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- David, R. J., & Collins, J. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1997-10-23
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1209-1214
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2313126154
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differing Birth Weight among Infants of U.S.-Born Blacks, African-Born Blacks, and U.S.-Born Whites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199710233371706
- The paper
- David, R. J., & Collins, J. W. (1997). Differing Birth Weight among Infants of U.S.-Born Blacks, African-Born Blacks, and U.S.-Born Whites. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710233371706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.