Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,853

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Open access
Limousin, Patricia, Krack, Paul, Pollak, Pierre, Benazzouz, Abdelhamid, Ardouin, Claire, Hoffmann, Dominique, Benabid, Alim-Louis·1998·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, treatment with levodopa is complicated by fluctuations between an "off" period, when the medication is not working and the motor symptoms of parkinsonism are present, and an "on" period, when the medication is causing improved mobility, often accompanied by debilitating dyskinesias. In animal models of Parkinson's disease, there is overactivity in the subthalamic nucleus, and electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves parkinsonism. We therefore sought to determine the efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We studied 24 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease in whom electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the subthalamic nucleus under stereotactic guidance with imaging and electrophysiologic testing of the location. Twenty were followed for at least 12 months. Clinical evaluations included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, a dyskinesia scale, and timed tests conducted before and after surgery, when patients were off and on medications. RESULTS: After one year of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, the patients' scores for activities of daily living and motor examination scores (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale parts II and III, respectively) off medication improved by 60 percent (P<0.001). The subscores improved for limb akinesia, rigidity, tremor, and gait. In the testing done on medication, the scores on part III improved by 10 percent (P<0.005). The mean dose of dopaminergic drugs was reduced by half. The cognitive-performance scores remained unchanged, but one patient had paralysis and aphasia after an intracerebral hematoma during the implantation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. The severity of symptoms off medication decreases, and the dose of levodopa can be reduced with consequent reduction in dyskinesias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199810153391603

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,853

Metadata

Authors
Limousin, P., Krack, P., Pollak, P., Benazzouz, A., Ardouin, C., Hoffmann, D., & Benabid, A.-L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1998-10-15
Volume
339
Issue
16
Pages
1105-1111
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2328435466
Cited by
1,853
References
3
FWCI
49.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinson's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199810153391603
The paper
Limousin, P., Krack, P., Pollak, P., Benazzouz, A., Ardouin, C., Hoffmann, D., & Benabid, A.-L. (1998). Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Advanced Parkinson's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199810153391603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.