Cited by 4,685Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carotid-Artery Intima and Media Thickness as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Older Adults

Open access
O'Leary, Daniel H., Polak, Joseph F., Kronmal, Richard A., Manolio, Teri A., Burke, Gregory L., Wolfson, Sidney K.·1999·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combined thickness of the intima and media of the carotid artery is associated with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. We studied the associations between the thickness of the carotid-artery intima and media and the incidence of new myocardial infarction or stroke in persons without clinical cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Noninvasive measurements of the intima and media of the common and internal carotid artery were made with high-resolution ultrasonography in 5858 subjects 65 years of age or older. Cardiovascular events (new myocardial infarction or stroke) served as outcome variables in subjects without clinical cardiovascular disease (4476 subjects) over a median follow-up period of 6.2 years. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiovascular events correlated with measurements of carotid-artery intima-media thickness. The relative risk of myocardial infarction or stroke increased with intima-media thickness (P<0.001). The relative risk of myocardial infarction or stroke (adjusted for age and sex) for the quintile with the highest thickness as compared with the lowest quintile was 3.87 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.72 to 5.51). The association between cardiovascular events and intima-media thickness remained significant after adjustment for traditional risk factors, showing increasing risks for each quintile of combined intima-media thickness, from the second quintile (relative risk, 1.54; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.28), to the third (relative risk, 1.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.26 to 2.67), fourth (relative risk, 2.01; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.38 to 2.91), and fifth (relative risk, 3.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.19 to 4.52). The results of separate analyses of myocardial infarction and stroke paralleled those for the combined end point. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in the thickness of the intima and media of the carotid artery, as measured noninvasively by ultrasonography, are directly associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults without a history of cardiovascular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199901073400103

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1001/jama.256.20.2823 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,015

Metadata

Authors
O'Leary, D. H., Polak, J. F., Kronmal, R. A., Manolio, T. A., Burke, G. L., & Wolfson, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1999-01-07
Volume
340
Issue
1
Pages
14-22
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2316167515
Cited by
4,685
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 210 · 2014: 191 · 2013: 251 · 2012: 231
FWCI
99.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085081-021, n01hc085079-024, n01hc085080-026)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85080, N01-HC85079)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
carotid intima-media thickness, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular risk factors, older adults, carotid artery, atherosclerosis, high-resolution ultrasound
MeSH terms
Aged, Carotid Arteries, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Tunica Intima, Tunica Media, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review