The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 7 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Dataset Shift in Clinical Trials This letter outlines how to identify, and potentially mitigate, common sources of “dataset shift” in machine-learning systems. This occurs when the model “training ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
2 of 7 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“A major driver of AI system malfunction is known as “dataset shift.”4,5”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [4] Subbaswamy A, Saria S. From development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI. Biostatistics 2020; 21: 345– 52. 31742354 source
The paper’s opening discussion says shifts between training and deployment are common and can cause poor performance or dangerous decisions. It explicitly calls this problem of shifting conditions that prevent generalization “dataset shift,” supporting the citing sentence’s paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked yetcites [5] Saria S, Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, January 29–31, 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2104626
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was a case in which dataset shift fundamentally altered the relationship between fevers and bacterial sepsis, leading the hospital’s clinical AI governing committee (which one of the authors of this letter chairs) to decommission its use.”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: In April 2020, the University of Michigan Hospital deactivated the Epic sepsis-alerting model because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the paper
“Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now regularly being used in medical settings,1”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1347– 58. 30943338 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 3
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Successful recognition and mitigation of dataset shift require both vigilant clinicians and sound technical oversight through AI governance teams.4,5”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Subbaswamy A, Saria S. From development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI. Biostatistics 2020; 21: 345– 52. 31742354 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4, “Open Challenges and Looking Forward” (page not supplied), calls for monitoring to detect shifts, maintenance to address them, and collaboration with domain experts when constructing models. It does not say that vigilant clinicians and AI governance teams are both required for this work. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites [5] Saria S, Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, January 29–31, 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2104626
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we group into changes in technology (e.g., software vendors), changes in population and setting (e.g., new demographics), and changes in behavior (e.g., new reimbursement incentives)”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although regulatory oversight is inconsistent and undeveloped.2,3”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Ross C Hospitals are using AI to predict the decline of Covid-19 patients — before knowing it works. Stat 4 24, 2020 (https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/24/coronavirus-hospitals-use-ai-to-predict-patient-decline-before-knowing-it-works/).
- Not checked yetcites [3] Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD) action plan Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, January 2021 (https://www.fdagov/media/145022/download).
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Safe deployment of clinical AI requires informed clinician-users”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Clinicians are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems with clinical AI.
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinicians are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems with clinical AI.
“who are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning.
“Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning, algorithms that leverage statistical methods to learn key patterns from clinical data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In April 2020, the University of Michigan Hospital deactivated the Epic sepsis-alerting model because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
“the University of Michigan Hospital implemented the widely used sepsis-alerting model developed by Epic Systems; in April 2020, the model had to be deactivated because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This quality becomes crucial when predictive models are deployed across different hospitals or healthcare systems, where variations in patient demographics, clinical practices, and data collection procedures can lead to inaccurate predictions [17, 18].”
From Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Small changes in the distribution of the underlying data between the algorithm training and clinical evaluation populations (i.e., dataset shift) can lead to substantial variation in clinical performance and expose patients to potential unexpected harm [21, 22].”
From Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Finlayson et al. argue that dataset shift in medicine is “the rule rather than the exception,” driven by changes in care delivery, clinical incentives, and documentation rather than by random variation alone [8].”
From Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Between 3 and 4 weeks after its first COVID-19 hospitalization, the University of Michigan paused ESM-generated alerts in April 2020 after nursing reports of overalerting.5”
From Quantification of Sepsis Model Alerts in 24 US Hospitals Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finlayson et al 55 have argued that clinicians who are well-prepared to recognize when AI tools are misbehaving are essential partners in safe deployment, and that institutions need governance structures, monitoring protocols, and clear pathways for frontline staff to escalate concerns.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Practical Applications Across Clinical Care, Scholarship, and Translation. (2026) · cites this paper as [55]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Understanding persistence and degradation is perhaps particularly critical for ML models, where dataset shift should be expected to cause declines in performance when the data used to train a model begins to look different from the data in a new context [8].”
From Managing a 'responsibility vacuum' in AI monitoring and governance in healthcare: a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This supports a workflow-aware interpretation of post-deployment fragility: degradation may be linked to how data are produced within evolving workflows and information systems, not only to who the patients are [8,18,33,35].”
From Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As AI solutions have emerged, a wide variety of governance best practices in the form of frameworks, governance structures, checklists, and guidelines have been proposed7–23.”
From Advancing healthcare AI governance through a comprehensive maturity model based on systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is well-known that such models may not generalize across settings or over time due to changes in patient populations, practice patterns, and data processes — a phenomenon known as dataset shift.1”
From Challenges in the postmarket surveillance of clinical prediction models. (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“The healthcare landscape is constantly changing; therefore, there is no guarantee that an AI algorithm with high performance will maintain its high performance in the future [89].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“The models should be monitored regularly to address biases that may emerge over time [89].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, these changes necessitate the periodic retraining and re-evaluation of AI systems to maintain their relevance and efficacy [69, 70].”
From Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
In the citing paper
“The dynamic nature of clinical practice, fluctuations in the prevalence of comorbidities, and various socio-environmental factors can precipitate shifts in the distribution of patient characteristics.”
From Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
In the citing paper
“Laboratory performance does not always translate directly to clinical practice [142,143,144,145,146].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [144]
Citations
Cites
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1814259 · Cited by 4,579
Self-citationFrom development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI
Subbaswamy, A., & Saria, S. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxz041 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Saria S Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness accountability and transparency January 29–31 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 848
A scoping review of silent trials for medical artificial intelligence
Tikhomirov, L., Semmler, C., Prizant, N., Bhasin, S., Kenyon, G., van der Vegt, A., Erdman, L., Kurian, N. C., Thompson, H., Palmer, L. J., et al. (2026) · Nature Health · doi:10.1038/s44360-025-00048-z · Cited by 17
Instability of the AUROC of clinical prediction models
van Leeuwen, F. D., Steyerberg, E. W., van Klaveren, D., Wessler, B., Kent, D. M., & van Zwet, E. W. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70011 · Cited by 19
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Liver Diseases and Liver Transplantation
Spann, A., Strauss, A. T., Davis, S. E., & Bhat, M. (2025) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.05.012 · Cited by 21
Abtahi, F., Seoane, F., Pau, I., & Vega-Barbas, M. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/87969 · Cited by 32
A unified framework for dataset shift diagnostics
Polo, F. M., Izbicki, R., Lacerda, E. G., Jimenez, J. P. I., & Vicente, R. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119612 · Cited by 24
Cordella, C., Marte, M. J., Liu, H., & Kiran, S. (2024) · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups · doi:10.1044/2024_persp-24-00037 · Cited by 26
Considerations for Quality Control Monitoring of Machine Learning Models in Clinical Practice
Faust, L. J., Wilson, P. M., Asai, S. W., Fu, S., Liu, H., Ruan, X., & Storlie, C. B. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/50437 · Cited by 18
Zeng, Q., Huang, C., & Zhu, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1656603 · Cited by 20
Patients should be informed when AI systems are used in clinical trials
Perni, S., Lehmann, L. S., & Bitterman, D. S. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02367-8 · Cited by 18
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Achtyes, E. D., Whybrow, P. C., & Bauer, M. (2023) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/a-2142-9325 · Cited by 21
An intentional approach to managing bias in general purpose embedding models
Weng, W., Sellergen, A., Kiraly, A. P., D’Amour, A., Park, J., Pilgrim, R., Pfohl, S., Lau, C. T., Natarajan, V., Azizi, S., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00227-3 · Cited by 21
Dong, T., Sinha, S., Zhai, B., Fudulu, D. P., Chan, J., Narayan, P., Judge, A., Caputo, M., Dimagli, A., Benedetto, U., et al. (2024) · JMIRx Med · doi:10.2196/45973 · Cited by 27
Lingham, G., Loughman, J., Panah, D. S., Harrington, S. C., Saunders, K. J., Ying, G., Cui, H., Kobia‐Acquah, E., & Flitcroft, I. (2024) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02899-w · Cited by 16
Zhang, Y., Wan, X.-H., Kong, Q., Liu, H., Liu, J., Guo, J., Yang, X., Zuo, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.102090 · Cited by 19
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence vs Professionally Translated Discharge Instructions
Martos, M., Fields, B., Finlayson, S. G., Hartell, N., Kim, T. Y., Larimer, E. L., Lau, J. J., Lin, Y.-H., Salaguinto, T., Tran, N., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32312 · Cited by 22
Self-citationSimon, S. T., Trinkley, K. E., Malone, D. C., & Rosenberg, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42163 · Cited by 17
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Transfusion Practice: An Analytical Assessment
Li, N., Goel, R., Raza, S., Riazi, K., Pan, J., Nguyen, H. Q., Shih, A. W. Y., D’Souza, A. G., Dubey, R., Tobian, A. A. R., et al. (2025) · Transfusion Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2025.150926 · Cited by 17
Kwak, S. G., & Kim, J. (2025) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.25075 · Cited by 20
Postoperative Overtriage to an Intensive Care Unit Is Associated With Low Value of Care
Loftus, T. J., Ruppert, M. M., Ozrazgat‐Baslanti, T., Balch, J. A., Shickel, B., Hu, D., Efron, P. A., Tighe, P. J., Hogan, W. R., Rashidi, P., et al. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005460 · Cited by 16
The ABC recommendations for validation of supervised machine learning results in biomedical sciences
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.979465 · Cited by 22
Bey, R., Cohen, A., Trebossen, V., Dura, B., Geoffroy, P., Jean, C., Landman, B., Petit-Jean, T., Chatellier, G., Sallah, K., et al. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-023-00046-7 · Cited by 14
Ruchonnet-Métrailler, I., Siebert, J. N., Hartley, M., & Lacroix, L. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/53662 · Cited by 17
Matsumoto, T., Walston, S. L., Walston, M., Kabata, D., Miki, Y., Shiba, M., & Ueda, D. (2022) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-022-00691-y · Cited by 15
Chow, J., Lee, R., & Wu, H. (2025) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-025-01493-8 · Cited by 19
Clinicians must participate in the development of multimodal AI
Banerji, C. R. S., Shah, A. B., Dabson, B., Chakraborti, T., Hellon, V., Harbron, C. G., & MacArthur, B. D. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103252 · Cited by 19
Real-time AI in Clinical Decision Support
Veernapu, K., Patil, B. K., Tharayil, A. S., Sindhura, C. L., Andy, A., Budhewar, A. S., Somwanshi, S. K., Kavya, K., Bharadwaj, M., & Raj, P. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6400-1.ch015 · Cited by 16
Monfredi, O., Moore, C. C., Sullivan, B. A., Keim‐Malpass, J., Fairchild, K. D., Loftus, T. J., Bihorac, A., Krahn, K. N., Dubrawski, A. W., Lake, D. E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.10.011 · Cited by 15
Nicora, G., Salemi, M., Marini, S., & Bellazzi, R. (2022) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100643 · Cited by 15
Verma, A. A., Trbovich, P., Mamdani, M., & Shojania, K. G. (2023) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015713 · Cited by 17
Jong, M. R., Jaspers, T. J. M., Kusters, C. H. J., Jukema, J. B., van Heslinga, R. A. H. V. E., Fockens, K. N., Boers, T. G. W., Visser, L. S., van der Putten, J. A., van der Sommen, F., et al. (2025) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1002/ueg2.12760 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Wynne, J. F., Wu, Y., Qiu, R. L. J., Tian, S., Wang, T., Patel, P. R., Yu, D. S., & Yang, X. (2025) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110711 · Cited by 14
Hou, J., Zhao, R., Cai, T. A., Beaulieu‐Jones, B. K., Seyok, T., Dahal, K. P., Yuan, Q., Xiong, X., Bonzel, C.-L., Fox, C., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18371 · Cited by 14
DeepQuality improves infant retinopathy screening
Li, L., Lin, D., Lin, Z., Li, M., Lian, Z., Zhao, L., Wu, X., Liu, L., Liu, J., Wei, X., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00943-3 · Cited by 14
Benzaquen, J., Hofman, P. M., Balcarcel, S. J. L., Leroy, S., Rouis, N., Padovani, B., Fontas, É., Marquette, C., & Boutros, J. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074680 · Cited by 14
Nakayama, L. F., de Matos, J. C. R. G., Quion, J., Novaes, F. D. C., Mitchell, W. G., Mwavu, R., Hung, C. J.-Y. J., Santiago, A. P. D., Phanphruk, W., Cardoso, J. S., et al. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618 · Cited by 20
Lee, M. K., Allareddy, V., Rampa, S., Elnagar, M. H., Oubaidin, M., Yadav, S., & Venugopalan, S. R. (2024) · Seminars in Orthodontics · doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2024.01.005 · Cited by 19
Editorial: Surfacing best practices for AI software development and integration in healthcare
Sendak, M., Vidal, D. E., Trujillo, S., Singh, K., Liu, X., & Balu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1150875 · Cited by 16
Self-citationOwens, K., Griffen, Z., & Damaraju, L. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13388-z · Cited by 19
“Understanding persistence and degradation is perhaps particularly critical for ML models, where dataset shift should be expected to cause declines in performance when the data used to train a model begins to look different from the data in a new context [8].”
Detection of Kidney Allograft Rejection Using Urinary Chemokines
Goutaudier, V., Aubert, O., Racapé, M., Truchot, A., Sablik, M., Raynaud, M., Vicaut, É., Rousseau, O., Elias, M., Divard, G., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000742 · Cited by 13
Automatic Dataset Shift Identification to Support Safe Deployment of Medical Imaging AI
Roschewitz, M., Mehta, R., Jones, C., & Glocker, B. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04981-0_7 · Cited by 23
Chang, L., & Sreedhar, R. (2026) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-025-02599-y · Cited by 14
Agweyu, A., Mwaniki, P., Musau, W., Korom, R., Isaaka, L., Wanyama, C. W., Kiptinness, S., Adan, N., Emmanuel-Fabula, M., & Mateen, B. A. (2026) · Nature Health · doi:10.1038/s44360-026-00082-5 · Cited by 22
Deep learning in acute vertigo diagnosis
Rastall, D. P. W., & Green, K. E. (2022) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120454 · Cited by 13
Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics
Grote, T. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2312207 · Cited by 14
Generative Artificial Intelligence Performs at a Second-Year Orthopedic Resident Level
Lum, Z. C., Collins, D. P., Dennison, S., Guntupalli, L., Choudhary, S., Saiz, A. M., & Randall, R. L. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.56104 · Cited by 13
Khan, E., Lambrakis, K., Liao, Z., Gerlach, J., Briffa, T. G., Cullen, L., Nelson, A. J., Verjans, J. W. H., & Chew, D. P. (2024) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101011 · Cited by 14
Zhang, P., Lin, F., Ma, F., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Feng, X., Fang, S., Zhang, H., Xiao, S., Yang, X., et al. (2025) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100668 · Cited by 13
Longitudinal Risk Prediction for Pediatric Glioma with Temporal Deep Learning
Tak, D., Garomsa, B. A., Zapaishchykova, A., Ye, Z., Vajapeyam, S., Mahootiha, M., Pardo, J. C. C., Smith, C., Familiar, A., Chaunzwa, T. L., et al. (2025) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2400703 · Cited by 15
Estimating and Evaluating Counterfactual Prediction Models
Boyer, C., Dahabreh, I. J., & Steingrimsson, J. A. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70287 · Cited by 17
Nelson, A. E., & Arbeeva, L. S. (2022) · The Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.3899/jrheum.220326 · Cited by 15
Frontiers of medical decision-making in the modern age of data analytics
Denton, B. T. (2022) · IISE Transactions · doi:10.1080/24725854.2022.2092918 · Cited by 13
The Clinical Researcher Journey in the Artificial Intelligence Era: The PAC-MAN’s Challenge
Bignami, E. G., Vittori, A., Lanza, R., Compagnone, C., Cascella, M., & Bellini, V. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11070975 · Cited by 13
Brester, C., Voutilainen, A., Tuomainen, T., Kauhanen, J., & Kolehmainen, M. (2022) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.03.010 · Cited by 14
Ruiz, N. R., Own, S. A., Smedby, K. E. E., Eloranta, S., Koch, S., Wästerlid, T., Krstić, A., & Boman, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.984021 · Cited by 16
Synthetic Datasets and Medical Artificial Intelligence Specifics
Shamaev, D. M. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21438-7_41 · Cited by 12
Automated hippocampal segmentation algorithms evaluated in stroke patients
Schell, M., Foltyn‐Dumitru, M., Bendszus, M., & Vollmuth, P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-38833-z · Cited by 12
Sanchez, M., Alford, K., Krishna, V., Huynh, T. M., Nguyen, C. D. T., Lungren, M. P., Truong, S. Q. H., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101207 · Cited by 13
Wang, X., Cai, L., & Xu, Y. (2023) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-023-05819-7 · Cited by 13
Salybekov, A. A., Wolfien, M., Hahn, W., Hidaka, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12030606 · Cited by 16
Early Warning Systems for Critical Illness Outside the Intensive Care Unit
Henry, K. E., & Giannini, H. M. (2024) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2024.03.007 · Cited by 13
MLHOps: Machine Learning Health Operations
Khattak, F. K., Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Pou-Prom, C., Koçak, S. A., Dolatabadi, E., Pandya, D., Seyyed-Kalantari, L., & Rudzicz, F. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3521279 · Cited by 31
Navigating prevalence shifts in image analysis algorithm deployment
Godau, P., Kalinowski, P., Christodoulou, E., Reinke, A., Tizabi, M. D., Ferrer, L., Jäger, P. F., & Maier-Hein, L. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103504 · Cited by 13
Payne, P., Wilcox, A. B., Embí, P. J., & Longhurst, C. (2022) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.10309 · Cited by 12
CheXstray: A Real-Time Multi-Modal Monitoring Workflow for Medical Imaging AI
Merkow, J., Soin, A., Long, J., Cohen, J. P., Saligrama, S., Bridge, C., Yang, X., Kaiser, S., Borg, S., Tarapov, I., et al. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43898-1_32 · Cited by 13
Waldock, W. J., Guni, A., Darzi, A. W., & Ashrafian, H. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001310 · Cited by 14
Registries, Databases and Repositories for Developing Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Care
Wang, J. W., & Williams, M. (2021) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.040 · Cited by 11
The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Valvular Heart Disease
Canning, C., Guo, J., Narang, A., Thomas, J. D., & Ahmad, F. S. (2023) · Heart Failure Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2023.03.001 · Cited by 11
Alfonso, F., & Crea, F. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad448 · Cited by 12
Grote, T. (2023) · Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.5195/pom.2023.139 · Cited by 11
Nolin-Lapalme, A., Corbin, D., Tastet, O., Avram, R., & Hussin, J. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2024.04.026 · Cited by 12
Jensen, M. P., Qiang, Z., Khan, D. Z., Stoyanov, D. V., Baldeweg, S. E., Jaunmuktane, Z., Brandner, S., & Marcus, H. J. (2024) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12981 · Cited by 11
Liu, L., Hong, J., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Wang, K., Li, M., Zhao, L., Liu, Z., Li, L., Cui, T., et al. (2024) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo-2024-325403 · Cited by 11
Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Achtyes, E. D., Whybrow, P. C., & Bauer, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100084 · Cited by 15
Shen, N., Zhang, Y., Ding, Z., Li, R., Quan, X., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Xiang, T., Zhang, Y., Yin, C., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000002730 · Cited by 12
Taber, P. A., Armin, J. S., Orozco, G., Fiol, G. D., Erdrich, J., Kawamoto, K., & Israni, S. T. (2023) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7 · Cited by 11
Artificial Intelligence Governance and Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery
Nwosu, O. I., Crowson, M. G., & Rameau, A. (2023) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.31013 · Cited by 11
Clinical competencies for using generative AI in patient care
Lewis, M., Navarro, D. F., Blease, C., Shah, R., Riggare, S. S., Delacroix, S., & Lehman, R. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-085324 · Cited by 13
Dadabhoy, F. Z., Driver, L., McEvoy, D. S., Stevens, R., Rubins, D., & Dutta, S. (2023) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.11.012 · Cited by 10
Zhai, Y., Chu, L., Liu, Y., Wang, D., & Wu, Y. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1844 · Cited by 18
Ethical debates amidst flawed healthcare artificial intelligence metrics
Gallifant, J., Bitterman, D. S., Celi, L. A., Gichoya, J. W., de Matos, J. C. R. G., McCoy, L. G., & Pierce, R. L. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01242-1 · Cited by 10
Transforming Physiology and Healthcare through Foundation Models
Godwin, R. C., Tung, A., Berkowitz, D. E., & Melvin, R. L. (2025) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00048.2024 · Cited by 11
Diagnostic framework to validate clinical machine learning models locally on temporally stamped data
Schuessler, M., Fleming, S. L., Meyer, S., Seto, T., & Hernandez‐Boussard, T. (2025) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-00965-w · Cited by 13
Kwong, J. C. C., Al‐Daqqaq, Z., Chelliahpillai, Y., Lee, S., Kim, K. J., Ringa, M., Feifer, A. H., Lajkosz, K., Wettstein, M. S., Chan, A., et al. (2025) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4145 · Cited by 10
The future of antimicrobial dosing in the ICU: an opportunity for data science
Corte, T. D., Elbers, P., & Waele, J. J. D. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06549-1 · Cited by 10
Garvey, K. V., Craig, K. J. T., Russell, R. G., Novak, L. L., Moore, D. E., Preininger, A. M., Jackson, G. P., & Miller, B. M. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01377-w · Cited by 11
Li, M., Chang, K., Mei, X., Bernheim, A., Chung, M., Steinberger, S., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., & Little, B. P. (2021) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.21.26717 · Cited by 10
Diagnosing and remediating harmful data shifts for the responsible deployment of clinical AI modelsPreprint
Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Dhalla, A., Pandya, D., Malkin, D. M., Razak, F. A., Verma, A. A., Goldenberg, A., & Dolatabadi, E. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.03.26.23286718 · Cited by 14
Why and How to Monitor Deployed AI Systems in Health Care
Keyes, T., Callahan, A., Pandya, A. S., Ambers, N., Banda, J. M., Fuentes, M., Lugtu, C., Masariya, P., Nallan, S., O’Brien, C., et al. (2026) · NEJM Catalyst · doi:10.1056/cat.25.0372 · Cited by 10
Integration of AI in surgical decision support: improving clinical judgment
Balch, J. A., Shickel, B., Bihorac, A., Upchurch, G. R., & Loftus, T. J. (2024) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-024-00257-2 · Cited by 9
Wang, B., Dohopolski, M. J., Bai, T., Wu, J., Hannan, R., Desai, N. B., Garant, A., Yang, D. X., Nguyen, D. T. D., Lin, M., et al. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad580f · Cited by 9
Ye, H. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2024-110171 · Cited by 9
A Clinician’s Guide to Understanding Bias in Critical Clinical Prediction Models
de Matos, J. C. R. G., Gallifant, J., Chowdhury, A., Economou-Zavlanos, N., Charpignon, M., Gichoya, J. W., Celi, L. A., Nazer, L. H., King, H., & Wong, A.-K. I. (2024) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2024.05.011 · Cited by 11
How AI Could Help Us in the Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Infections?
Epelde, F. (2024) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens13110940 · Cited by 11
Lessons for local oversight of AI in medicine from the regulation of clinical laboratory testing
Herman, D. S., Reece, J. T., & Weissman, G. E. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01369-1 · Cited by 12
Steinfeldt, J., Wild, B., Buergel, T., Pietzner, M., zu Belzen, J. U., Vauvelle, A., Hegselmann, S., Denaxas, S., Hemingway, H., Langenberg, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-55879-x · Cited by 11
Liu, W., Wu, Y., Zheng, Z., Bittle, M. J., Yu, W., & Kharrazi, H. H. K. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/64649 · Cited by 9
Liu, J., Nguyen, A. N., Daniel Capurro, N., & Verspoor, K. M. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2025.3574254 · Cited by 11
CT Biomarkers for Phenotypic Biological Aging: Emerging Concepts and Advantages
Lee, M. H., Garrett, J. W., Liu, D., & Pickhardt, P. J. (2025) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.250007 · Cited by 12
Salwei, M. E., Davis, S. E., Reale, C., Novak, L. L., Walsh, C. G., Beebe, R., Nelson, S. D., Sundrani, S. C., Rose, S. L., Wright, A. T., et al. (2025) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf136 · Cited by 13
Clinician in the loop: a flawed solution for AI oversight
Toro-Tobón, D., Ponte, O. P., Montori, V. M., & Brito, J. P. (2026) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-089213 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Finlayson, S. G., Subbaswamy, A., Singh, K., Bowers, J., Kupke, A., Zittrain, J., Kohane, I. S., & Saria, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Bayesian Health, New York, NY
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2021-07-15
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-286
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC8665481
- OpenAlex
- W3177617320
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 336 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 18
- FWCI
- 27.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1840088)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2018-10877)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- distribution shift, clinical trials, machine learning, clinician bias, model generalization, bias mitigation, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Information Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medical Informatics, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
