The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 7 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Dataset Shift in Clinical Trials This letter outlines how to identify, and potentially mitigate, common sources of “dataset shift” in machine-learning systems. This occurs when the model “training ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
2 Own interpretation · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“A major driver of AI system malfunction is known as “dataset shift.”4,5”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [4] Subbaswamy A, Saria S. From development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI. Biostatistics 2020; 21: 345– 52. 31742354 source
The paper’s opening discussion says shifts between training and deployment are common and can cause poor performance or dangerous decisions. It explicitly calls this problem of shifting conditions that prevent generalization “dataset shift,” supporting the citing sentence’s paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked yetcites [5] Saria S, Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, January 29–31, 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2104626
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was a case in which dataset shift fundamentally altered the relationship between fevers and bacterial sepsis, leading the hospital’s clinical AI governing committee (which one of the authors of this letter chairs) to decommission its use.”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: In April 2020, the University of Michigan Hospital deactivated the Epic sepsis-alerting model because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the paper
“Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now regularly being used in medical settings,1”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1347– 58. 30943338 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 3
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Successful recognition and mitigation of dataset shift require both vigilant clinicians and sound technical oversight through AI governance teams.4,5”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Subbaswamy A, Saria S. From development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI. Biostatistics 2020; 21: 345– 52. 31742354 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4, “Open Challenges and Looking Forward” (page not supplied), calls for monitoring to detect shifts, maintenance to address them, and collaboration with domain experts when constructing models. It does not say that vigilant clinicians and AI governance teams are both required for this work. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites [5] Saria S, Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, January 29–31, 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2104626
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we group into changes in technology (e.g., software vendors), changes in population and setting (e.g., new demographics), and changes in behavior (e.g., new reimbursement incentives)”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although regulatory oversight is inconsistent and undeveloped.2,3”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Ross C Hospitals are using AI to predict the decline of Covid-19 patients — before knowing it works. Stat 4 24, 2020 (https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/24/coronavirus-hospitals-use-ai-to-predict-patient-decline-before-knowing-it-works/).
- Not checked yetcites [3] Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD) action plan Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, January 2021 (https://www.fdagov/media/145022/download).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Safe deployment of clinical AI requires informed clinician-users”
§ The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence > TO THE EDITOR:
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Clinicians are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems with clinical AI.
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinicians are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems with clinical AI.
“who are generally responsible for identifying and reporting emerging problems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning.
“Most clinical AI systems today use machine learning, algorithms that leverage statistical methods to learn key patterns from clinical data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In April 2020, the University of Michigan Hospital deactivated the Epic sepsis-alerting model because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
“the University of Michigan Hospital implemented the widely used sepsis-alerting model developed by Epic Systems; in April 2020, the model had to be deactivated because of spurious alerting owing to changes in patients’ demographic characteristics associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This quality becomes crucial when predictive models are deployed across different hospitals or healthcare systems, where variations in patient demographics, clinical practices, and data collection procedures can lead to inaccurate predictions [17, 18].”
From Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Small changes in the distribution of the underlying data between the algorithm training and clinical evaluation populations (i.e., dataset shift) can lead to substantial variation in clinical performance and expose patients to potential unexpected harm [21, 22].”
From Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Finlayson et al. argue that dataset shift in medicine is “the rule rather than the exception,” driven by changes in care delivery, clinical incentives, and documentation rather than by random variation alone [8].”
From Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Between 3 and 4 weeks after its first COVID-19 hospitalization, the University of Michigan paused ESM-generated alerts in April 2020 after nursing reports of overalerting.5”
From Quantification of Sepsis Model Alerts in 24 US Hospitals Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finlayson et al 55 have argued that clinicians who are well-prepared to recognize when AI tools are misbehaving are essential partners in safe deployment, and that institutions need governance structures, monitoring protocols, and clear pathways for frontline staff to escalate concerns.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Practical Applications Across Clinical Care, Scholarship, and Translation. (2026) · cites this paper as [55]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Understanding persistence and degradation is perhaps particularly critical for ML models, where dataset shift should be expected to cause declines in performance when the data used to train a model begins to look different from the data in a new context [8].”
From Managing a 'responsibility vacuum' in AI monitoring and governance in healthcare: a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This supports a workflow-aware interpretation of post-deployment fragility: degradation may be linked to how data are produced within evolving workflows and information systems, not only to who the patients are [8,18,33,35].”
From Validation is not enough: Longitudinal evidence of post-deployment fragility in clinical AI systems (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As AI solutions have emerged, a wide variety of governance best practices in the form of frameworks, governance structures, checklists, and guidelines have been proposed7–23.”
From Advancing healthcare AI governance through a comprehensive maturity model based on systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is well-known that such models may not generalize across settings or over time due to changes in patient populations, practice patterns, and data processes — a phenomenon known as dataset shift.1”
From Challenges in the postmarket surveillance of clinical prediction models. (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“The healthcare landscape is constantly changing; therefore, there is no guarantee that an AI algorithm with high performance will maintain its high performance in the future [89].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“The models should be monitored regularly to address biases that may emerge over time [89].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, these changes necessitate the periodic retraining and re-evaluation of AI systems to maintain their relevance and efficacy [69, 70].”
From Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
In the citing paper
“The dynamic nature of clinical practice, fluctuations in the prevalence of comorbidities, and various socio-environmental factors can precipitate shifts in the distribution of patient characteristics.”
From Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
In the citing paper
“Laboratory performance does not always translate directly to clinical practice [142,143,144,145,146].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [144]
Citations
Cites
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1814259 · Cited by 4,579
Self-citationFrom development to deployment: dataset shift, causality, and shift-stable models in health AI
Subbaswamy, A., & Saria, S. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxz041 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Saria S Subbaswamy A. Tutorial: safe and reliable machine learning. In: Proceedings of the conference on fairness accountability and transparency January 29–31 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence
Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4 · Cited by 2,028
“Existing medical AI models struggle with distribution shifts, in which distributions of data shift owing to changes in technologies, procedures, settings or populations 37,38 .”
BackgroundVasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9 · Cited by 1,039
Self-citationVasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070904 · Cited by 665
Self-citationFairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations
Ueda, D., Kakinuma, T., Fujita, S., Kamagata, K., Fushimi, Y., Ito, R., Matsui, Y., Nozaki, T., Nakaura, T., Fujima, N., et al. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3 · Cited by 607
Feng, J., Phillips, R. V., Malenica, I., Bishara, A., Hubbard, A. E., Celi, L. A., & Pirracchio, R. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00611-y · Cited by 423
Competencies for the Use of Artificial Intelligence–Based Tools by Health Care Professionals
Russell, R. G., Lovett Novak, L., Patel, M., Garvey, K. V., Craig, K. J. T., Jackson, G. P., Moore, D., & Miller, B. M. (2023) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004963 · Cited by 320
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Beam, A. L., Drazen, J. M., Kohane, I. S., Leong, T.-Y., Manrai, A. K., & Rubin, E. J. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme2206291 · Cited by 303
Self-citationWILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518
Chakraborty, C., Bhattacharya, M., Pal, S., & Lee, S. (2023) · Current Research in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.crbiot.2023.100164 · Cited by 311
Data drift in medical machine learning: implications and potential remedies
Sahiner, B., Chen, W., Samala, R. K., & Petrick, N. (2023) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20220878 · Cited by 279
A Guide to Cross-Validation for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging
Bradshaw, T., Huemann, Z., Hu, J., & Rahmim, A. (2023) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.220232 · Cited by 315
Robust and data-efficient generalization of self-supervised machine learning for diagnostic imaging
Azizi, S., Culp, L., Freyberg, J., Mustafa, B., Baur, S., Kornblith, S., Chen, T., Tomasev, N., Mitrović, J., Strachan, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01049-7 · Cited by 250
Artificial intelligence in positive mental health: a narrative review
Thakkar, A., Gupta, A., & Sousa, A. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1280235 · Cited by 329
Machine learning in point-of-care testing: innovations, challenges, and opportunities
Han, G., Goncharov, A., Eryılmaz, M., Ye, S., Palanisamy, B., Ghosh, R., Lisi, F., Rogers, E., Guzmán, D., Yigci, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58527-6 · Cited by 262
Harnessing the Power of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Chen, Z., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432 · Cited by 244
Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review
Plana, D., Shung, D. L., Grimshaw, A. A., Saraf, A., Sung, J. J. Y., & Kann, B. H. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946 · Cited by 236
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in liver transplantation
Bhat, M., Rabindranath, M., Chara, B. S., & Simonetto, D. A. (2023) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.006 · Cited by 235
Precision medicine in stroke: towards personalized outcome predictions using artificial intelligence
Bonkhoff, A. K., & Grefkes, C. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab439 · Cited by 216
Koçak, B., Ponsiglione, A., Stanzione, A., Bluethgen, C., Santinha, J., Ugga, L., Huisman, M., Klontzas, M. E., Cannella, R., & Cuocolo, R. (2024) · Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.4274/dir.2024.242854 · Cited by 168
“10,48,140 By identifying and addressing biases, these systems can improve healthcare outcomes and equity.”
Arora, A., & Arora, A. (2022) · Future Healthcare Journal · doi:10.7861/fhj.2022-0013 · Cited by 161
Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles
Pinsky, M. R., Bedoya, A., Bihorac, A., Celi, L., Churpek, M., Economou-Zavlanos, N. J., Elbers, P., Saria, S., Liu, V., Lyons, P. G., et al. (2024) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-024-04860-z · Cited by 160
Self-citationUnderstanding Liability Risk from Using Health Care Artificial Intelligence Tools
Mello, M. M., & Guha, N. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmhle2308901 · Cited by 155
Lum, Z. C. (2023) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000002704 · Cited by 155
Medical Artificial Intelligence and Human Values
Yu, K.-H., Healey, E., Leong, T.-Y., Kohane, I. S., & Manrai, A. K. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2214183 · Cited by 149
Self-citationREFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science
Kapoor, S., Cantrell, E. M., Peng, K., Pham, T. H., Bail, C. A., Gundersen, O. E., Hofman, J. M., Hullman, J. R., Lones, M. A., Malik, M. M., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk3452 · Cited by 255
APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support
Kwong, J. C. C., Khondker, A., Lajkosz, K., McDermott, M. B. A., Borrat, X., McCradden, M. D., Mamdani, M., Kulkarni, G. S., & Johnson, A. E. W. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35377 · Cited by 159
Petch, J., Kemppainen, J., Pettengell, C., Aviv, S., Butler, B., Pond, G. R., Saha, A., Bogach, J., Allard-Coutu, A., Sztur, P., et al. (2023) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.22.00182 · Cited by 140
Predictive models for clinical decision making: Deep dives in practical machine learning
Eloranta, S., & Boman, M. (2022) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13483 · Cited by 144
Henry, K. E., Adams, R., Parent, C., Soleimani, H., Sridharan, A., Johnson, L., Hager, D. N., Cosgrove, S. E., Markowski, A., Klein, E. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01895-z · Cited by 144
Self-citationDemographic bias in misdiagnosis by computational pathology models
Vaidya, A. J., Chen, R. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Song, A. H., Jaume, G., Yang, Y., Hartvigsen, T., Dyer, E., Lu, M. Y., Lipková, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02885-z · Cited by 148
Empirical data drift detection experiments on real-world medical imaging data
Kore, A., Abbasi Bavil, E., Subasri, V., Abdalla, M., Fine, B., Dolatabadi, E., & Abdalla, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46142-w · Cited by 124
“…is to detect clinically important changes which might have been caused by changes in the underlying population of patients, disease prevalence, equipment changes, practice/referral pattern among many other factors, and facilitate intervention (retain, warn users, retire model) promptly 6,28,35 .”
A Research Ethics Framework for the Clinical Translation of Healthcare Machine Learning
McCradden, M. D., Anderson, J. A., Stephenson, E. A., Drysdale, E., Erdman, L., Goldenberg, A., & Shaul, R. Z. (2022) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.2013977 · Cited by 123
A Nationwide Network of Health AI Assurance Laboratories
Shah, N. H., Halamka, J. D., Saria, S., Pencina, M., Tazbaz, T., Tripathi, M., Callahan, A., Hildahl, H., & Anderson, B. (2024) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.26930 · Cited by 114
Self-citationJha, A. K., Bradshaw, T., Buvat, I., Hatt, M., Prabhat, K. C., Liu, C., Obuchowski, N., Saboury, B., Slomka, P. J., Sunderland, J. J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263239 · Cited by 117
Stevens, A., & Stetson, P. D. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104550 · Cited by 125
Javaid, A., Zghyer, F., Kim, C., Spaulding, E. M., Isakadze, N., Ding, J., Kargilis, D., Gao, Y., Rahman, F., Brown, D. E., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100379 · Cited by 119
Self-citationLu, S.-C., Swisher, C. L., Chung, C. D., Jaffray, D. A., & Sidey-Gibbons, C. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1129380 · Cited by 123
Silva-Rodríguez, J., Chakor, H., Kobbi, R., Dolz, J., & Ayed, I. B. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103357 · Cited by 134
Beyond generalization: a theory of robustness in machine learning
Freiesleben, T., & Grote, T. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04334-9 · Cited by 106
Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Scoping Review
Moy, S., Irannejad, M., Manning, S. J., Farahani, M., Ahmed, Y., Gao, E., Prabhune, R., Lorenz, S., Mirza, R. M., & Klinger, C. A. (2024) · Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · doi:10.17294/2330-0698.2029 · Cited by 113
Generalizability of FDA-Approved AI-Enabled Medical Devices for Clinical Use
Windecker, D., Baj, G., Shiri, I., Kazaj, P. M., Kaesmacher, J., Gräni, C., & Siontis, G. C. M. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8052 · Cited by 127
Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart failure
Averbuch, T., Sullivan, K., Sauer, A. J., Mamas, M. A., Voors, A. A., Gale, C. P., Metra, M., Ravindra, N. G., & Spall, H. G. C. V. (2022) · European Heart Journal - Digital Health · doi:10.1093/ehjdh/ztac025 · Cited by 106
D’Amico, S., Dall’Olio, D., Sala, C., Dall’Olio, L., Sauta, E., Zampini, M., Asti, G., Lanino, L., Maggioni, G., Campagna, A., et al. (2023) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.23.00021 · Cited by 118
Ghosh, S., Zhao, X., Alim, M., Brudno, M., & Bhat, M. (2024) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331740 · Cited by 110
Liao, F., Adelaine, S., Afshar, M., & Patterson, B. W. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.931439 · Cited by 101
Koçak, B., Klontzas, M. E., Stanzione, A., Meddeb, A., Demircioğlu, A., Blüthgen, C., Bressem, K. K., Ugga, L., Mercaldo, N. D., Díaz, O., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.ejrai.2025.100030 · Cited by 119
Clift, A. K., Dodwell, D., Lord, S., Petrou, S., Brady, M., Collins, G. S., & Hippisley-Cox, J. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073800 · Cited by 97
The impact of commercial health datasets on medical research and health-care algorithms
Alberto, I. R. I., Alberto, N. R. I., Ghosh, A. K., Jain, B., Jayakumar, S., Martinez-Martin, N., McCague, N., Moukheiber, D., Moukheiber, L., Moukheiber, M., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00025-0 · Cited by 86
Artificial intelligence applications in histopathology
Bahadir, C. D., Omar, M., Rosenthal, J., Marchionni, L., Liechty, B., Pisapia, D. J., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2024) · Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44287-023-00012-7 · Cited by 93
Homeyer, A., Geißler, C., Schwen, L. O., Zakrzewski, F., Evans, T., Strohmenger, K., Westphal, M., Bülow, R. D., Kargl, M., Karjauv, A., et al. (2022) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-022-01147-y · Cited by 88
Risk of Bias in Chest Radiography Deep Learning Foundation Models
Glocker, B., Jones, C., Roschewitz, M., & Winzeck, S. (2023) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.230060 · Cited by 109
Li, F., Wang, S., Gao, Z., Qing, M., Pan, S. L., Liu, Y., & Hu, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1510792 · Cited by 97
Analyzing Patient Trajectories With Artificial Intelligence
Allam, A., Feuerriegel, S., Rebhan, M., & Krauthammer, M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/29812 · Cited by 77
Wang, R., Chaudhari, P., & Davatzikos, C. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2211613120 · Cited by 84
London, A. J. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100622 · Cited by 76
Detecting and Remediating Harmful Data Shifts for the Responsible Deployment of Clinical AI Models
Subasri, V., Krishnan, A., Kore, A., Dhalla, A., Pandya, D., Wang, B., Malkin, D., Razak, F., Verma, A. A., Goldenberg, A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13685 · Cited by 87
Kann, B. H., Likitlersuang, J., Bontempi, D., Ye, Z., Aneja, S., Bakst, R. L., Kelly, H. R., Juliano, A. F. T., Payabvash, S., Guenette, J. P., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00046-8 · Cited by 77
Gomez-Cabello, C. A., Borna, S., Pressman, S., Haider, S. A., Haider, C. R., & Forte, A. J. (2024) · European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe14030045 · Cited by 74
Deep Learning for Cardiovascular Imaging
Wehbe, R. M., Katsaggelos, A. K., Hammond, K. J., Hong, H., Ahmad, F. S., Ouyang, D., Shah, S. J., McCarthy, P. M., & Thomas, J. D. (2023) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3142 · Cited by 75
AI in radiology: From promise to practice − A guide to effective integration
Katal, S., York, B. R., & Gholamrezanezhad, A. (2024) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111798 · Cited by 75
Chen, S., Yu, J., Chamouni, S., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03566-x · Cited by 73
“Consequently, these changes necessitate the periodic retraining and re-evaluation of AI systems to maintain their relevance and efficacy [69, 70].”
BackgroundThe silent trial - the bridge between bench-to-bedside clinical AI applications
Kwong, J. C. C., Erdman, L., Khondker, A., Skreta, M., Goldenberg, A., McCradden, M. D., Lorenzo, A. J., & Rickard, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.929508 · Cited by 73
“…trained on retrospective data alone cannot reliably function in real-world clinical settings as they are prone to dataset drift, which may include variations in how data is de fi ned and collected, or potential changes in the standard of care if training cohorts span long periods of time (13).”
BackgroundSingh, H., Mhasawade, V., & Chunara, R. (2022) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000023 · Cited by 67
Cheng, F., Wang, F., Tang, J., Zhou, Y., Fu, Z., Zhang, P., Haines, J. L., Leverenz, J. B., Gan, L., Hu, J., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101379 · Cited by 63
Ferrario, A., Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09681-1 · Cited by 64
“What we can design is a controlled comparison of the performance of a human expert and the one of a system that executes a (precisely defined) predictive 17 Others use the term ‘dataset shift’ (Finlayson et al., 2021) instead.”
Liu, X., Hu, P., Yeung, W. L. K., Zhang, Z., Ho, V., Liu, C., DuMontier, C., Thoral, P. J., Mao, Z., Cao, D., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00128-0 · Cited by 61
Stogiannos, N., Malik, R., Kumar, A., Barnes, A., Pogose, M., Harvey, H., McEntee, M. F., & Malamateniou, C. (2023) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20221157 · Cited by 66
Lyons, P. G., Hofford, M. R., Yu, S. C., Michelson, A. P., Payne, P. R. O., Hough, C. L., & Singh, K. (2023) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182 · Cited by 62
Self-citationChest X-ray in Emergency Radiology: What Artificial Intelligence Applications Are Available?
Irmici, G., Cè, M., Caloro, E., Khenkina, N., Pepa, G. D., Ascenti, V., Martinenghi, C. M. A., Papa, S., Oliva, G., & Cellina, M. I. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13020216 · Cited by 63
Gulati, G., Upshaw, J., Wessler, B. S., Brazil, R. J., Nelson, J., Klaveren, D. V., Lundquist, C. M., Park, J. G., McGinnes, H., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2022) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008487 · Cited by 62
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for clinical pharmacology
Ryan, D. K., Maclean, R., Balston, A. J., Scourfield, A., Shah, A. D., & Ross, J. (2023) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.15930 · Cited by 67
Innovative applications of artificial intelligence in zoonotic disease management
Guo, W., Lv, C., Guo, M., Zhao, Q. C., Yin, X., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Science in One Health · doi:10.1016/j.soh.2023.100045 · Cited by 66
Quantification of Sepsis Model Alerts in 24 US Hospitals Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Wong, A., Cao, J., Lyons, P. G., Dutta, S., Major, V. J., Ötleş, E., & Singh, K. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35286 · Cited by 57
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence In Health And Health Care: Priorities For Action
Matheny, M. E., Goldsack, J. C., Saria, S., Shah, N. H., Gerhart, J. L., Cohen, I. G., Price, W. N., Patel, B., Payne, P., Embí, P. J., et al. (2025) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01003 · Cited by 74
Self-citationGe, J., Kim, W. R., Lai, J. C., & Kwong, A. J. (2022) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.003 · Cited by 60
Expectations for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Psychiatry
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Whybrow, P. C., Achtyes, E. D., & Bauer, M. (2022) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01378-5 · Cited by 61
Tree-based local explanations of machine learning model predictions, AraucanaXAI
Parimbelli, E., Buonocore, T. M., Nicora, G., Michalowski, W., Wilk, S., & Bellazzi, R. (2021) · Artif. Intell. Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102471 · Cited by 46
EHR foundation models improve robustness in the presence of temporal distribution shift
Guo, L., Steinberg, E., Fleming, S. L., Posada, J., Lemmon, J., Pfohl, S. R., Shah, N. H., Fries, J., & Sung, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30820-8 · Cited by 65
Sobhy, M., Abdelkarim, E. A., Hussein, M. A., Aziz, T. A., Al‐Asmari, F., Alabbosh, K. F., Cui, H., & Lin, L. (2025) · Food Bioscience · doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2025.105937 · Cited by 56
Abbas, S. R., Seol, H., Abbas, Z., & Lee, S. W. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13141642 · Cited by 64
Clinical AI tools must convey predictive uncertainty for each individual patient
Banerji, C. R. S., Chakraborti, T., Harbron, C. G., & MacArthur, B. D. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02562-7 · Cited by 73
Integrating artificial intelligence into healthcare systems: more than just the algorithm
Kwong, J. C. C., Nickel, G., Wang, S., & Kvedar, J. C. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01066-z · Cited by 54
Koch, L. M., Baumgartner, C. F., & Berens, P. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01085-w · Cited by 53
Singer, M., Angus, D., Annane, D., Bauer, M. W., Kalil, A. C., Klompas, M., Machado, F. R., Martin, G. S., Randolph, A. G., Shankar‐Hari, M., et al. (2026) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)02422-5 · Cited by 62
Coiera, E. W., & Liu, S. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100860 · Cited by 56
Munroe, E. S., Spicer, A. B., Castellví-Font, A., Zalucky, A. A., Dianti, J., Linck, E. J. G., Talisa, V. B., Urner, M., Angus, D. C., Kassis, E. B., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00054-2 · Cited by 53
Roschewitz, M., Jones, C., & Glocker, B. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01846-8 · Cited by 50
A normative framework for artificial intelligence as a sociotechnical system in healthcare
McCradden, M. D., Joshi, S. D., Anderson, J. A., & London, A. J. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100864 · Cited by 59
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials
Cunningham, J. W., Abraham, W. T., Bhatt, A. S., Dunn, J., Felker, G. M., Jain, S. S., Lindsell, C. J., Mace, M., Martyn, T., Shah, R. U., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.069 · Cited by 54
Sustainable deployment of clinical prediction tools—a 360° approach to model maintenance
Davis, S. E., Embí, P. J., & Matheny, M. E. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae036 · Cited by 46
Davis, S. E., Dorn, C., Park, D. J., & Matheny, M. E. (2025) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf039 · Cited by 43
Clinical use of artificial intelligence requires AI-capable organizations
Novak, L. L., Russell, R. G., Garvey, K., Patel, M., Thomas Craig, K. J., Snowdon, J., & Miller, B. (2023) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad028 · Cited by 43
Ética e inteligencia artificial
Galiana, L. I., Corral-Gudino, L., & Miramontes‐González, J. P. (2024) · Revista Clínica Española · doi:10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.007 · Cited by 59
Coronary Risk Estimation Based on Clinical Data in Electronic Health Records
Petrazzini, B. O., Chaudhary, K., Márquez‐Luna, C., Forrest, I. S., Rocheleau, G., Cho, J. H., Narula, J., Nadkarni, G. N., & Do, R. (2022) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.021 · Cited by 49
Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Predictive Models in Health Care Settings
Vaid, A., Sawant, A. S., Suárez‐Fariñas, M., Lee, J., Kaul, S. K., Kovatch, P., Freeman, R., Jiang, J. J., Jayaraman, P., Fayad, Z. A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-0949 · Cited by 50
Self-citationThe application of artificial intelligence in the management of sepsis
Yang, J., Hao, S., Huang, J., Chen, T., Liu, R., Zhang, P., Feng, M., He, Y., Xiao, W., Hong, Y., et al. (2023) · Medical Review · doi:10.1515/mr-2023-0039 · Cited by 49
The AI Future of Emergency Medicine
Petrella, R. J. (2024) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.031 · Cited by 43
A proposal for developing a platform that evaluates algorithmic equity and accuracy
Cerrato, P. L., Halamka, J. D., & Pencina, M. J. (2022) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100423 · Cited by 43
Advancing healthcare AI governance through a comprehensive maturity model based on systematic review
Hussein, R., Zink, A., Ramadan, B., Howard, F. M., Hightower, M., Shah, S., & Beaulieu-Jones, B. K. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02418-7 · Cited by 42
Artificial intelligence for the detection, prediction, and management of atrial fibrillation
Isaksen, J. L., Baumert, M., Hermans, A. N. L., Maleckar, M. M., & Linz, D. (2022) · Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie · doi:10.1007/s00399-022-00839-x · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Finlayson, S. G., Subbaswamy, A., Singh, K., Bowers, J., Kupke, A., Zittrain, J., Kohane, I. S., & Saria, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Bayesian Health, New York, NY
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2021-07-15
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-286
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC8665481
- OpenAlex
- W3177617320
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 336 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 18
- FWCI
- 27.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1840088)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2018-10877)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- distribution shift, clinical trials, machine learning, clinician bias, model generalization, bias mitigation, clinical decision support
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Information Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medical Informatics, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
