Cited by 40Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The Fibrates Story — A Tepid End to a PROMINENT Drug

Virani, Salim S.·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor α modulator that has putative greater triglyceride-lowering and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol–raising properties than other fibrates.1 Now in the Journal, Das Pradhan et al.2 describe the results of the Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular Outcomes by Reducing Triglycerides in Patients with Diabetes (PROMINENT) trial. In this trial, 10,497 patients with type 2 diabetes, a triglyceride level between 200 and 499 mg per deciliter, and an HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter or less were randomly assigned to receive 0.2-mg tablets of pemafibrate twice daily or placebo. In the PROMINENT trial, two cohorts . . .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejme2213208

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of MACE reduction with pemafibrate is likely due to a lack of effect on apoB-containing particle number and modest increases in LDL-C.

    “Although pemafibrate significantly reduced TGs (–26.2%), VLDL-C, and remnant cholesterol, it did not reduce MACE compared to placebo, likely due to a lack of effect on apoB-containing particle number and modest increases in LDL-C [64, 65].”
  • In PROMINENT, pemafibrate did not reduce MACE compared to placebo.

    “Although pemafibrate significantly reduced TGs (–26.2%), VLDL-C, and remnant cholesterol, it did not reduce MACE compared to placebo, likely due to a lack of effect on apoB-containing particle number and modest increases in LDL-C [64, 65].”
  • In PROMINENT, pemafibrate significantly reduced TGs (-26.2%), VLDL-C, and remnant cholesterol.

    “Although pemafibrate significantly reduced TGs (–26.2%), VLDL-C, and remnant cholesterol, it did not reduce MACE compared to placebo, likely due to a lack of effect on apoB-containing particle number and modest increases in LDL-C [64, 65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Virani, S. S.
Affiliations
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Virani, Salim S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
387
Issue
21
Pages
1991-1992
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4308258594
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
pemafibrate, fibrates, PPARα modulator, type 2 diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia, triglyceride-lowering therapy, HDL cholesterol, cardiovascular outcomes, drug discontinuation
MeSH terms
Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fever, Humans, Fibric Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review