Cited by 214Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Informed Consent, Comparative Effectiveness, and Learning Health Care

Faden, Ruth R., Beauchamp, Tom L., Kass, Nancy E.·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors argue that in a learning health care system with ethically robust oversight policies, a streamlined consent process could replace formal written informed-consent procedures for many studies, and patient consent would not be required at all for some trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmhle1313674

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics
Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.134 · Cited by 498
Self-citation
The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight
Kass, N. E., Faden, R. R., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.133 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?
Truog, R. D., Robinson, W. M., Randolph, A. G., & Morris, A. H. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903113401013 · Cited by 192
Ethics and Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research With Prospective Electronic Clinical Data
Faden, R., KASS, N. E., Whicher, D. M., Stewart, W., & Tunis, S. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1e4b · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: An ethical analysis*
Morris, M. C., & Nelson, R. M. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000257333.95528.b8 · Cited by 28

Show all 5 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 214

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
Monach, P. A., & Branch‐Elliman, W. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048534 · Cited by 11
Predictable and SuStainable Implementation of National Cardiovascular Registries (PASSION) infrastructure: A think tank report from Medical Device Epidemiological Network Initiative (MDEpiNet)
Zeitler, E. P., Al‐Khatib, S. M., Drozda, J. P., Kessler, L. G., Kirtane, A. J., Kong, D. F., Laschinger, J. C., Marinac‐Dabic, D., Morice, M., Reed, T. L., et al. (2015) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.029 · Cited by 11
Research Versus Quality Improvement: Distinct or a Distinction Without a Difference? A Case Study Comparison of Two Studies
Kirsh, S. R., Wu, W.-C., Edelman, D. E., & Aron, D. C. (2014) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40048-5 · Cited by 11
Trends in Consent for Clinical Trials in Cardiovascular Disease
Kerkhoff, L. A., Butler, J., Kelkar, A. A., Shore, S., Speight, C. D., Wall, L. K., & Dickert, N. W. (2016) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.116.003582 · Cited by 12
Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J., Campbell, M., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J., Hemming, K., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2 · Cited by 11
Deferred consent for the enrolment of neonates in delivery room studies: strengthening the approach
den Boer, M. C., Houtlosser, M., Foglia, E. E., Davis, P. G., van Kaam, A. H., Kamlin, C. O. F., Schmölzer, G. M., de Vries, M. C., & Pas, A. B. T. (2019) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2018-316461 · Cited by 11
Towards a Responsible Transition to Learning Healthcare Systems in Precision Medicine: Ethical Points to Consider
Wouters, R. H. P., van der Graaf, R., Rigter, T., Bunnik, E. M., Ploem, M. C., de Wert, G. M. W. R., Dondorp, W., Cornel, M. C., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11060539 · Cited by 11
Ethical issues in pragmatic trials of “standard‐of‐care” interventions in learning health care systems
Kim, S. Y. H. (2018) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.10045 · Cited by 10
Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States
Weinfurt, K. P., Lin, L., & Sugarman, J. (2019) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774519858917 · Cited by 10
Differences in demographics and outcomes based on method of consent for a randomised controlled trial on heat loss prevention in the delivery room
Vohra, S., Reilly, M., Rac, V. E., Bhaloo, Z., Zayack, D., Wimmer, J., Vincer, M., Ferrelli, K. R., Kiss, A., Soll, R. F., et al. (2020) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2020-319045 · Cited by 10
Reflections on a Principal of Research Ethics: Tom Beauchamp, Moral Specification, and Waivers of Informed Consent
Morain, S. R., Gelinas, L. C., Wendler, D. S., O’Rourke, P. P., & Largent, E. A. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2570684 · Cited by 9
The Ethics of Clinical Trials for Cancer Therapy
Howie, L. J., & Peppercorn, J. M. (2014) · North Carolina Medical Journal · doi:10.18043/ncm.75.4.270 · Cited by 9
Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol
Nicholls, S. G., Carroll, K. A., Brehaut, J., Weijer, C., Hey, S. P., Goldstein, C. E., Zwarenstein, M., Graham, I. D., McKenzie, J. E., McIntyre, L., et al. (2018) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0332-z · Cited by 9
Historia clínica electrónica en los ensayos clínicos de efectividad con medicamentos integrados en la práctica clínica
Carcas, A. J., Abad‐Santos, F., Perruca, L. S., & Dal‐Ré, R. (2015) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2015.01.028 · Cited by 8
Experiences and challenges faced by patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalised and participated in a randomised controlled trial: a qualitative study
Hofstetter, L., Tinhof, V., Mayfurth, H., Kurnikowski, A., Rathkolb, V., Reindl‐Schwaighofer, R., Traugott, M. T., Omid, S., Zoufaly, A., Tong, A., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062176 · Cited by 8
Transparent Defaults and Consent for Participation in a Learning Health Care System: An Empirical Study
Dranseika, V., & Piasecki, J. (2020) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/1556264620904272 · Cited by 8
Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice
Wada, K., & Nisker, J. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102231 · Cited by 7
The TELE-DD project on treatment nonadherence in the population with type 2 diabetes and comorbid depression
Delgado, J. F. R., del Hoyo, M. L. L., Urcola‐Pardo, F., Monreal‐Bartolomé, A., Ruiz, D. C. G., Borao, M. M. G., Alcázar, A. B. A., Casbas, J. P. M., Casas, A. A., Funcia, M. T. A., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87410-9 · Cited by 10
Were There “Additional Foreseeable Risks” in the SUPPORT Study? Lessons Not Learned from the ARDSnet Clinical Trials
SILVERMAN, H. J., & Dreyfuss, D. (2014) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.403 · Cited by 7
Optimizing Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials
Perni, S., Jimenez, R., & Jagsi, R. (2023) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.001 · Cited by 8
The patient's perspective on the need for informed consent for minimal risk studies: Development of a survey-based measure
Kaplan, S. H., Gombosev, A., Fireman, S., Sabin, J. E., Heim, L. T., Shimelman, L., Kaganov, R. E., Osann, K., Tjoa, T. T., & Huang, S. S. (2016) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2016.1161672 · Cited by 7
Ethical Considerations for Increased Transparency and Reproducibility in the Retrospective Analysis of Health Care Data
Rotelli, M. D. (2015) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479015578155 · Cited by 7
Compassion and Empathy in Basic Medical Science Teaching: A Suggested Model
Crawford, D. R. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.20205 · Cited by 6
Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent?
Dal‐Ré, R., Carcas, A. J., & Carné, X. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2332-1 · Cited by 6
Progressing from “Whether to” to “How to” Conduct Pragmatic Trials
Casey, J. D., Rice, T. W., & Semler, M. W. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2217123 · Cited by 6
Ethical issues in implementation science: perspectives from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop
Dickert, N. W., Spiegelman, D. L., Blumenthal‐Barby, J. S., Graham, G. N., Joffe, S., Kahn, J. M., KASS, N. E., Kim, S. Y. H., Kerlin, M. P., Langford, A. T., et al. (2024) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-024-01403-6 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Comparative Effectiveness Trials: Generic Misassumptions Underlying the SUPPORT Controversy
Tyson, J. E., Walsh, M. C., & D’Angio, C. T. (2014) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-4176 · Cited by 5
Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?
Groisman, I. J., Égalité, N., & Godard, B. (2014) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-80 · Cited by 6
Un estudio fenomenológico acerca de las percepciones de los profesionales de Enfermería sobre la muerte
Rodríguez, R. C. (2020) · Ene · doi:10.4321/s1988-348x2020000100007 · Cited by 5
Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Real-World Evidence: Concept and Implementation
Jeong, N., Kim, S.-H., Lim, E., & Choi, N. (2020) · Cardiovascular Prevention and Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.36011/cpp.2020.2.e12 · Cited by 5
Can an antimicrobial stewardship program reduce length of stay of immune-competent adult patients admitted to hospital with diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia? Study protocol for pragmatic controlled non-randomized clinical study
Didiodato, G., McArthur, L., Beyene, J., Smieja, M., & Thabane, L. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0871-2 · Cited by 5
Recruitment into Clinical Trials: Between Rocks and Hard Places
Trachtman, H. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics · doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000e101 · Cited by 4
Ethical Dimensions of Dynamic Consent in Data-Intense Biomedical Research—Paradigm Shift, or Red Herring?
Schmietow, B. (2016) · Research ethics forum · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28731-7_15 · Cited by 4
Embedded point of care randomisation for evaluating comparative effectiveness questions: PROSPECTOR-critical care feasibility study protocol
Wilson, M. G., Asselbergs, F. W., Miguel, R., Brealey, D. A., & Harris, S. K. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059995 · Cited by 4
Designing and Implementing “Living and Breathing” Clinical Trials
Horvat, C. M., King, A. J., & Huang, D. T. (2023) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2023.02.002 · Cited by 4
Minimum Risk and HEAT-PPCI
Berger, B. J. (2014) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.007 · Cited by 4
Clinical practice guidelines for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong: Renal Nursing Practice
Kong, I., Law, M.-C., & Ng, G. S. (2019) · Nephrology · doi:10.1111/nep.13504 · Cited by 4
Pragmatic randomised clinical trials using electronic health records: general practitioner views on a model of a priori consent
Hills, T. E., Semprini, A. C., & Beasley, R. W. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2658-8 · Cited by 4
Electronic medical record in clinical trials of effectiveness of drugs integrated in clinical practice
Carcas, A. J., Abad‐Santos, F., Perruca, L. S., & Dal‐Ré, R. (2015) · Medicina Clínica (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2016.03.024 · Cited by 3
A Video-Based Consent Tool: Development and Effect of Risk–Benefit Framing on Intention to Randomize
Lois, A. W., Kohler, J. E., Monsell, S. E., Pullar, K., Victory, J., Odom, S. R., Fischkoff, K. N., Kaji, A. H., Evans, H. L., Sohn, V. Y., et al. (2022) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.089 · Cited by 3
Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
Laurijssen, S. J. M., van der Graaf, R., Schuit, E., den Haan, M. C., van Dijk, W. B., Groenwold, R. H. H., le Sessie, S., Grobbee, D. E., & de Vries, M. C. (2023) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.10379 · Cited by 3
Integrated rapid-cycle comparative effectiveness trials using flexible point of care randomisation in electronic health record systems
Wilson, M. G., Palmer, E., Asselbergs, F. W., & Harris, S. K. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104273 · Cited by 3
Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care
Shepherd, L. L. (2017) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1177/1073110517737535 · Cited by 3
Ostriches and Obligations: Ethical Challenges Facing Research on Usual Care
Morain, S. R. (2019) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.1033 · Cited by 3
Personal Care in Learning Health Care Systems
Miller, F. G., & Kim, S. Y. H. (2015) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2015.0024 · Cited by 3
Learning Health Systems: A Multi-perspective Analysis
Shaygan, A., Lavoie, J. R., & Daim, T. U. (2018) · IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) · doi:10.1109/temscon.2018.8488425 · Cited by 3
Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Vaszar, L. T., Sharp, R. R., Carter, R. E., & Wright, R. S. (2024) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.05.001 · Cited by 3
What is the need for comparative effectiveness studies in IBD?
Flasar, M. H., & Cross, R. K. (2014) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1586/17474124.2014.945916 · Cited by 3
Putting Critical Care Medicine on Trial*
Webb, S. A. R. (2015) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001058 · Cited by 3
Biomedical Research Topics
Whitney, S. N. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20705-6_7 · Cited by 3
Tuning the Ethical Strings of the Learning Health System
Peppercorn, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02448 · Cited by 3
Digital integration of research conduct into clinical care: results of the PROSPECTOR randomised feasibility study
Wilson, M. G., Asselbergs, F. W., Saleem, N., Jeilani, L., Brealey, D. A., Sydes, M. R., & Harris, S. K. (2025) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113081 · Cited by 2
Experimenting with modifications to consent forms in comparative effectiveness research: understanding the impact of language about financial implications and key information
Niyibizi, N. K., Speight, C. D., Najarro, G. R., Mitchell, A. R., Sadan, O., Ko, Y., & Dickert, N. W. (2022) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00736-x · Cited by 2
Improving the evidence base for better comparative effectiveness research
Brophy, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer.15.36 · Cited by 2
A priori consent within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: a web-based survey of statin use in primary care
Semprini, A. C., Hills, T. E., Braithwaite, I. E., Weatherall, M., & Beasley, R. W. (2017) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000193 · Cited by 2
The contemporary conundrum of antithrombotic drugs after intracerebral haemorrhage
Salman, R. A., & Bell, S. (2015) · Advances in Clinical Neuroscience & Rehabilitation · doi:10.47795/pvbm5613 · Cited by 2
Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition
Kim, J. P., Ryan, K., & Roberts, L. W. (2019) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/1556264619862467 · Cited by 2
Personalized Trial Ethics and Institutional Review Board Submissions
Samuel, J. P., & Wootton, S. H. (2022) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.2ded0fc5 · Cited by 2
Commentary on Vickers
Califf, R. M. (2014) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774514553485 · Cited by 2
In Favor of a No-Consent/Opt-Out Model of Research With Clinical Samples
Ballantyne, A. (2015) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1062171 · Cited by 2
Strategies for E-Commerce Platform Adoption in the Manufacturing Sector in Western India
Parikh, N. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 2
¿Es tiempo de plantear ensayos clínicos de bajo nivel de intervención sin el consentimiento informado de los participantes?
Dal‐Ré, R., & Carné, X. (2017) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2017.10.027 · Cited by 2
Health Information Standardisation as a basis for Learning Health SystemsPreprint
McLachlan, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04811 · Cited by 4
Ethical Considerations of Cancer Immunotherapy and Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Treatment
Garg, A. K., Pandey, P., Singh, V., & Ashique, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-7022-9_16 · Cited by 2
Health economic evaluations of perinatal complications with conflicting maternal-fetal interests: a scoping review protocol
Mo, L., Aguirre, A. L., Sivakumar, N., Prompalit, S., Hedriana, H. L., & Hoch, J. S. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091521 · Cited by 1
Empirical research related to the ethics of pragmatic clinical trials: A scoping review
Mehl, K. R., Morain, S. R., & Sugarman, J. (2025) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.70041 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association
Harzand, A., Ross, E., Weissler, E. H., Zheng, Y., Shah, N. H., Alabi, O., Attia, Z. I., & Beckman, J. A. (2026) · Circulation Population Health and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/hcq.0000000000000146 · Cited by 1
Disclosing the Possibility of Early Trial Termination to Prospective Clinical Trial Participants
Hutchinson, N., Gelinas, L. C., & Bierer, B. E. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2675905 · Cited by 1
Versorgungsforschung als Methode der Problemdefinition und Evaluation
Schrappe, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10783-3_11 · Cited by 1
Kepuasan pasien dalam perawatan periodontal di Klinik Periodonsia Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Universitas Padjadjaran
Puspitasari, P., Susanto, A., & Pribadi, I. M. S. (2018) · Padjadjaran Journal of Dental Researchers and Students · doi:10.24198/pjdrs.v3i1.22309 · Cited by 1
Establishing a dedicated UTI clinic: Challenges and a guide to success
Lambregts, M. M. C., Lidén, M. M., Pollara, G., Lewis, T., van Uhm, J. I. M., Joseph, A., Logan, S. A. E., & Huttner, A. C. (2024) · CMI Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cmicom.2024.105036 · Cited by 1
Eliciting Patient Preferences for Pragmatic Critical Care Trials: A Qualitative Study
Palakshappa, J. A., Rischall, M. L., Strahley, A. E., Cecil, A. E., Prekker, M. E., Driver, B. E., Denny, B. H., & Gibbs, K. W. (2025) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.202410-1122oc · Cited by 1
Creating a Learning Healthcare System in the ICU
Yu, J. A., & Kahn, J. M. (2015) · Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13761-2_43 · Cited by 1
Is it time to discuss on low-intervention clinical trials without participants’ informed consent?
Dal‐Ré, R., & Carné, X. (2018) · Medicina Clínica (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2017.10.035 · Cited by 1
Improving the Ethical Review of Health Policy and Systems Research: Some Suggestions
Persad, G. (2021) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2021.16 · Cited by 1
Die ethische Aufsicht über die Datenwissenschaft im Gesundheitswesen
McLennan, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62987-1_4 · Cited by 1
Commentary on Wilson et al.
King, N. M. P. (2014) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774514545337 · Cited by 1
What Is the Right Way to Respect Patient Perspectives?
Goodman, Z. I., & Flory, J. (2015) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1062176 · Cited by 1
Commentary on Vickers
Lauer, M. S. (2014) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774514553482 · Cited by 1
Cuando la información para los participantes de un ensayo de efectividad comparativa acaba en los tribunales: ¿se abre la caja de Pandora?
Dal‐Ré, R., Omeñaca, F., & Gracia, D. (2016) · Medicina Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2016.01.008
Bioethical and Regulatory Issues in Newborn Medical Research
Cook, N. (2015) · NeoReviews · doi:10.1542/neo.16-8-e462
Strategies for the optimal use of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis
van Vollenhoven, R. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13108-5_8
When the information provided to participants of a comparative effectiveness trial ends up in the court: The opening of Pandora's box?
Dal‐Ré, R., Omeñaca, F., & Gracia, D. (2016) · Medicina Clínica (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2016.01.023
2nd TwiCs symposium summary
Relton, C., Burbach, M., Collett, C., Flory, J., Gerlich, S., Holm, S., Hunn, A., Kim, S. Y., Kwakkenbos, L., May, A. M., et al. (2017) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Ethical Challenges of Current Oversight and Regulation of Novel Medical Devices in Neurosurgery
Muskens, I. S., Gupta, S., Hulsbergen, A. F. C., Moojen, W. A., & Broekman, M. L. D. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05502-8_3
Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials
Kitsis, E. A. (2019) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1572819
Single-Team taTME
Caycedo‐Marulanda, A., Ashamalla, S., & Wai, G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_22
Therapeutic Effectiveness Assessment: Approaches in Contemporary Research
Matei, M., & Lemaire, F. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.11013-x
Participants’ written informed consent in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials with medicines
Dal‐Ré, R. (2020) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2020.1732816
Qualitative Outcomes in CME/CPD: Exploring Non-Linear Contexts and Lived Experiences in Patient-Directed Interventions
Howson, A., & Turell, W. (2020) · Journal of European CME · doi:10.1080/21614083.2020.1834760
Prendersi cura, ricercare, sperimentare, … Tante, diverse, o una sola domanda/e o risposta/e?
Tognoni, G. (2014) · Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca
Streamlined versus traditional consent for low-risk comparative effectiveness trials: a randomized experimental study to measure patients' and public attitudes
KASS, N. E., Faden, R., Morain, S. R., Hallez, K., Stametz, R. A., Milo, A. R., & Clarke, D. N. (2022) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2021-0173
Self-citation
Next Edition of the ISPOR Code of Ethics: Is It Setting Us up for the Era of Digitized Health Care?
(2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.020
Consent to Clinical Research
Cutler, B. L. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Psychology and Law · doi:10.4135/9781412959537.n59
TWO MODELS OF INFORMED CONSENT
Jansen, L. A. (2021) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052522000048
Using Single-Case Experimental Design and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Evaluate the Treatment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Clinical Practice
Ferguson, R. J., Terhorst, L. A., Gibbons, B., Posluszny, D. M., Chang, H. T., Bovbjerg, D. H., & McDonald, B. C. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15184643
Patients’ perception of their safety in the hospital
Pisarenco, C., Manea, M., Cheianu, E., Nepoliuc, L., Crasnova, O., & Ciobanu, S. (2024) · Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova Medical Sciences · doi:10.52692/1857-0011.2023.3-77.02
Research Design and Planning
(2024) · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2414-1.ch003
Engaging Asian American Family Caregivers in Clinical Trials: Awareness, Preferences, and Concerns
Rubovits, E., Yedavalli, A., Sadruddin, S., Lavari, K., Mudar, R. A., Leung, V., Cothran, F. A., & Raj, M. (2024) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648241271354
How Much Is Enough?
McAllister, P. G. (2024) · Advances in data mining and database management book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3848-3.ch003

Authors: Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., & Kass, N. E.
Affiliations: Johns Hopkins University (US)
Georgetown University (US)
ORCID: Faden, Ruth R.
Kass, Nancy E.
Venue: New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Published: 2014-02-20
Volume: 370
Issue: 8
Pages: 766-768
ISSN: 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
1533-4406
DOI: 10.1056/nejmhle1313674
OpenAlex: W2022826022
Cited by: 214
References: 5
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21
FWCI: 33.02
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords: informed consent, comparative effectiveness research, clinical trials, ethical oversight, patient consent, research ethics
MeSH terms: Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Informed Consent, Patient Participation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Ethics, Research, Comparative Effectiveness Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Informed Consent, Comparative Effectiveness, and Learning Health Care

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks