Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue for High-Risk Breast Cancer

Open access
Rodenhuis, Sjoerd, Bontenbal, Marijke, Beex, Louk V.A.M., Wagstaff, John, Richel, Dick J., Nooij, Marianne A., Voest, Emile E., Hupperets, Pierre, van Tinteren, Harm, Peterse, Hans L., TenVergert, Elisabeth M., de Vries, Elisabeth G.E.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer is controversial. We studied its efficacy in patients with 4 to 9 or 10 or more tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients younger than 56 years of age who had undergone surgery for breast cancer and who had no distant metastases were eligible if they had at least four tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes. Patients in the conventional-dose group received fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) every three weeks for five courses, followed by radiotherapy and tamoxifen. The high-dose treatment was identical, except that high-dose chemotherapy (6 g of cyclophosphamide per square meter of body-surface area, 480 mg of thiotepa per square meter, and 1600 mg of carboplatin per square meter) with autologous peripheral-blood hematopoietic progenitor-cell transplantation replaced the fifth course of FEC. RESULTS: Of the 885 patients, 442 were assigned to the high-dose group and 443 to the conventional-dose group. After a median follow-up of 57 months, the actuarial 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 59 percent in the conventional-dose group and 65 percent in the high-dose group (hazard ratio for relapse in the high-dose group, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.03; P=0.09). In the group with 10 or more positive nodes, the relapse-free survival rates were 51 percent in the conventional-dose group and 61 percent in the high-dose group (P=0.05 by the log-rank test; hazard ratio for relapse, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.50 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose alkylating therapy improves relapse-free survival among patients with stage II or III breast cancer and 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes. This benefit may be confined to patients with HER-2/neu-negative tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa022794

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Rodenhuis, S., Bontenbal, M., Beex, L. V. A. M., Wagstaff, J., Richel, D. J., Nooij, M. A., Voest, E. E., Hupperets, P., van Tinteren, H., Peterse, H. L., TenVergert, E. M., & de Vries, E. G. E.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-07-03
Volume
349
Issue
1
Pages
7-16
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1973560717
Cited by
258
References
11
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Dose Chemotherapy with Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue for High-Risk Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa022794
The paper
Rodenhuis, S., Bontenbal, M., Beex, L. V. A. M., Wagstaff, J., Richel, D. J., Nooij, M. A., Voest, E. E., Hupperets, P., van Tinteren, H., Peterse, H. L., TenVergert, E. M., & de Vries, E. G. E. (2003). High-Dose Chemotherapy with Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue for High-Risk Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022794

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.