Cited by 4,938Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering therapy with statins reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, but the optimal level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 4162 patients who had been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome within the preceding 10 days and compared 40 mg of pravastatin daily (standard therapy) with 80 mg of atorvastatin daily (intensive therapy). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, documented unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, revascularization (performed at least 30 days after randomization), and stroke. The study was designed to establish the noninferiority of pravastatin as compared with atorvastatin with respect to the time to an end-point event. Follow-up lasted 18 to 36 months (mean, 24). RESULTS: The median LDL cholesterol level achieved during treatment was 95 mg per deciliter (2.46 mmol per liter) in the standard-dose pravastatin group and 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter) in the high-dose atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates of the primary end point at two years were 26.3 percent in the pravastatin group and 22.4 percent in the atorvastatin group, reflecting a 16 percent reduction in the hazard ratio in favor of atorvastatin (P=0.005; 95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 26 percent). The study did not meet the prespecified criterion for equivalence but did identify the superiority of the more intensive regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who have recently had an acute coronary syndrome, an intensive lipid-lowering statin regimen provides greater protection against death or major cardiovascular events than does a standard regimen. These findings indicate that such patients benefit from early and continued lowering of LDL cholesterol to levels substantially below current target levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa040583

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1994, Lancet, 344, 1383

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,027

Metadata

Authors
Cannon, C. P., Braunwald, E., McCabe, C. H., Rader, D. J., Rouleau, J. L., Belder, R., Joyal, S. V., Hill, K. A., Pfeffer, M. A., & Skene, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-04-08
Volume
350
Issue
15
Pages
1495-1504
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2159449551
Cited by
4,938
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 163 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 215 · 2016: 178 · 2015: 216 · 2014: 213 · 2013: 215 · 2012: 229
FWCI
442.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, statins, intensive lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol, pravastatin, atorvastatin, non-inferiority, major adverse cardiovascular events, revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Angina, Unstable, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Pyrroles, Proportional Hazards Models, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review