Cited by 752Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Safety of anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease

Open access
Cannon, Christopher P., Shah, Sukrut, Dansky, Hayes M., Davidson, Michael, Brinton, Eliot A., Gotto, Antonio M., Stepanavage, Michael, Liu, Sherry Xueyu +5 more·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anacetrapib is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that raises high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety profile of anacetrapib in patients with coronary heart disease or at high risk for coronary heart disease. Eligible patients who were taking a statin and who had an LDL cholesterol level that was consistent with that recommended in guidelines were assigned to receive 100 mg of anacetrapib or placebo daily for 18 months. The primary end points were the percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol at 24 weeks (HDL cholesterol level was a secondary end point) and the safety and side-effect profile of anacetrapib through 76 weeks. Cardiovascular events and deaths were prospectively adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 1623 patients underwent randomization. By 24 weeks, the LDL cholesterol level had been reduced from 81 mg per deciliter (2.1 mmol per liter) to 45 mg per deciliter (1.2 mmol per liter) in the anacetrapib group, as compared with a reduction from 82 mg per deciliter (2.1 mmol per liter) to 77 mg per deciliter (2.0 mmol per liter) in the placebo group (P<0.001)--a 39.8% reduction with anacetrapib beyond that seen with placebo. In addition, the HDL cholesterol level increased from 41 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter) to 101 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) in the anacetrapib group, as compared with an increase from 40 mg per deciliter (1.0 mmol per liter) to 46 mg per deciliter (1.2 mmol per liter) in the placebo group (P<0.001)--a 138.1% increase with anacetrapib beyond that seen with placebo. Through 76 weeks, no changes were noted in blood pressure or electrolyte or aldosterone levels with anacetrapib as compared with placebo. Prespecified adjudicated cardiovascular events occurred in 16 patients treated with anacetrapib (2.0%) and 21 patients receiving placebo (2.6%) (P = 0.40). The prespecified Bayesian analysis indicated that this event distribution provided a predictive probability (confidence) of 94% that anacetrapib would not be associated with a 25% increase in cardiovascular events, as seen with torcetrapib. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anacetrapib had robust effects on LDL and HDL cholesterol, had an acceptable side-effect profile, and, within the limits of the power of this study, did not result in the adverse cardiovascular effects observed with torcetrapib. (Funded by Merck Research Laboratories; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00685776.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1009744

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannon, C. P., Shah, S., Dansky, H. M., Davidson, M., Brinton, E. A., Gotto, A. M., Stepanavage, M., Liu, S. X., Gibbons, P., Ashraf, T. B., Zafarino, J., Mitchel, Y., & Barter, P.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Radiant Research (United States) (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • The Heart Research Institute (AU)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
363
Issue
25
Pages
2406-2415
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2090464684
Cited by
749
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 116
FWCI
107.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
anacetrapib, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, coronary artery disease, LDL cholesterol lowering, HDL cholesterol, statin combination therapy, cardiovascular safety, cardiovascular events, drug safety, high-risk patients, lipid-lowering therapy, blood pressure, electrolytes, aldosterone, Bayesian hierarchical model, cardiovascular hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Bayes Theorem, Combined Modality Therapy, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Oxazolidinones, Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review