Cited by 356Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Early and Late Benefits of High-Dose Atorvastatin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access
Ray, Kausik K., Cannon, Christopher P., McCabe, Carolyn H., Cairns, Richard, Tonkin, Andrew M., Sacks, Frank M., Jackson, Graham, Braunwald, Eugene·2005·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives Our objective was to determine the timing of benefit with intensive statin therapy after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in two time windows: an early window soon after an ACS and a late window in more stable patients.Background The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) trial showed that the use of intensive statin therapy improved clinical outcomes over two years in ACS patients versus standard therapy. The relative contributions of early or late effects to the overall clinical efficacy of intensive therapy are presently unclear.Methods A total of 4,162 patients with ACS were recruited in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. Patients were randomized to intensive statin therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) or standard therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg). The composite triple end point of death, MI, or rehospitalization for recurrent ACS was determined in each group at 30 days. The composite triple and primary end points were assessed in stable patients from six months to the end of study, after censoring for clinical events before six months.Results The composite end point at 30 days occurred in 3.0% of patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg versus 4.2% of patients receiving pravastatin 40 mg (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.99; p = 0.046). In stable patients, atorvastatin 80 mg was associated with a composite event rate of 9.6% versus 13.1% in the pravastatin 40 mg group (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89; p = 0.003).Conclusions Intensive statin therapy early after ACS leads to a reduction in clinical events at 30 days, consistent with greater early pleiotropic effects. In stable patients, intensive statin therapy provides long-term reduction in clinical events when compared with standard therapy. Thus, ACS patients should be started in-hospital and continued long-term on intensive statin therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.077

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from specific trials and meta-analysis support routine early use of prompt and intensive statin therapy.

    “Data from specific trials 23,30,35 and meta-analysis support routine early use of prompt and intensive statin therapy.”

    From ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias (2011) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Data from specific trials and meta-analysis support routine early use of prompt, intensive, and prolonged statin therapy.

    “Data from specific trials 358-360 and meta-analysis support routine early use of prompt, intensive and prolonged statin therapy.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [360]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or rehospitalization with recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by statin treatment, in patients free from clinical events from six months to end of study. 1409 JACC Vol. 46, No. 8, 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, K. K., Cannon, C. P., McCabe, C. H., Cairns, R., Tonkin, A. M., Sacks, F. M., Jackson, G., & Braunwald, E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Cannon, Christopher P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
1405-1410
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1484156179
Cited by
356
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
26.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
atorvastatin, acute coronary syndrome, high-intensity statin therapy, pravastatin, PROVE IT-TIMI 22, pleiotropy, myocardial infarction, hospital readmission, long-term clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Acute Disease, Angina, Unstable, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Pyrroles, Syndrome, Time Factors, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review