Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization

Windecker, Stephan, Remondino, Andrea, Eberli, Franz R., Jüni, Peter, Räber, Lorenz, Wenaweser, Peter, Togni, Mario, Billinger, Michael, Tüller, David, Seiler, Christian, Roffi, Marco, Corti, Roberto, Sütsch, Gabor, Maier, Willibald, Lüscher, Thomas, Hess, Otto M., Egger, Matthias, Meier, Bernhard·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, reduce the risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of drug-eluting stents. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents in 1012 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization of the target lesion) by nine months. Follow-up angiography was completed in 540 of 1012 patients (53.4 percent). RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The rate of major adverse cardiac events at nine months was 6.2 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 10.8 percent in the paclitaxel-stent group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.86; P=0.009). The difference was driven by a lower rate of target-lesion revascularization in the sirolimus-stent group than in the paclitaxel-stent group (4.8 percent vs. 8.3 percent; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.93; P=0.03). Rates of death from cardiac causes were 0.6 percent in the sirolimus-stent group and 1.6 percent in the paclitaxel-stent group (P=0.15); the rates of myocardial infarction were 2.8 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively (P=0.49); and the rates of angiographic restenosis were 6.6 percent and 11.7 percent, respectively (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, the use of sirolimus-eluting stents results in fewer major adverse cardiac events, primarily by decreasing the rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa051175

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Windecker, S., Remondino, A., Eberli, F. R., Jüni, P., Räber, L., Wenaweser, P., Togni, M., Billinger, M., Tüller, D., Seiler, C., Roffi, M., Corti, R., Sütsch, G., Maier, W., Lüscher, T., Hess, O. M., Egger, M., & Meier, B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-08-18
Volume
353
Issue
7
Pages
653-662
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1997207240
Cited by
593
References
19
FWCI
76.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa051175
The paper
Windecker, S., Remondino, A., Eberli, F. R., Jüni, P., Räber, L., Wenaweser, P., Togni, M., Billinger, M., Tüller, D., Seiler, C., Roffi, M., Corti, R., Sütsch, G., Maier, W., Lüscher, T., Hess, O. M., Egger, M., & Meier, B. (2005). Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa051175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.