Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Nasal Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Bode, Lonneke G.M., Kluytmans, Jan A.J.W., Wertheim, Heiman F.L., Bogaers, Diana, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina M.J.E., Roosendaal, Robert, Troelstra, Annet, Box, Adrienne T.A., Voss, Andreas, van der Tweel, Ingeborg, van Belkum, Alex, Verbrugh, Henri A., Vos, Margreet C.·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus are at increased risk for health care-associated infections with this organism. Decolonization of nasal and extranasal sites on hospital admission may reduce this risk. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, we assessed whether rapid identification of S. aureus nasal carriers by means of a real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay, followed by treatment with mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap, reduces the risk of hospital-associated S. aureus infection. RESULTS: From October 2005 through June 2007, a total of 6771 patients were screened on admission. A total of 1270 nasal swabs from 1251 patients were positive for S. aureus. We enrolled 917 of these patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, of whom 808 (88.1%) underwent a surgical procedure. All the S. aureus strains identified on PCR assay were susceptible to methicillin and mupirocin. The rate of S. aureus infection was 3.4% (17 of 504 patients) in the mupirocin-chlorhexidine group, as compared with 7.7% (32 of 413 patients) in the placebo group (relative risk of infection, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.75). The effect of mupirocin-chlorhexidine treatment was most pronounced for deep surgical-site infections (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.62). There was no significant difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality between the two groups. The time to the onset of nosocomial infection was shorter in the placebo group than in the mupirocin-chlorhexidine group (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The number of surgical-site S. aureus infections acquired in the hospital can be reduced by rapid screening and decolonizing of nasal carriers of S. aureus on admission. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN56186788.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0808939

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,219

Metadata

Authors
Bode, L. G. M., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Wertheim, H. F. L., Bogaers, D., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., Roosendaal, R., Troelstra, A., Box, A. T. A., Voss, A., van der Tweel, I., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Vos, M. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-01-07
Volume
362
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2157715904
Cited by
1,219
References
2
FWCI
62.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Nasal Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0808939
The paper
Bode, L. G. M., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Wertheim, H. F. L., Bogaers, D., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., Roosendaal, R., Troelstra, A., Box, A. T. A., Voss, A., van der Tweel, I., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Vos, M. C. (2010). Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Nasal Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0808939

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.