Cited by 1,249Infection Control in HealthcareNosocomial Infections in ICUSurgical site infection prevention

Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals

Open access
Magill, Shelley S., O’Leary, Erin, Janelle, Sarah J., Thompson, Deborah L., Dumyati, Ghinwa, Nadle, Joelle, Wilson, Lucy E., Kainer, Marion A. +24 more·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A point-prevalence survey that was conducted in the United States in 2011 showed that 4% of hospitalized patients had a health care-associated infection. We repeated the survey in 2015 to assess changes in the prevalence of health care-associated infections during a period of national attention to the prevention of such infections. METHODS: At Emerging Infections Program sites in 10 states, we recruited up to 25 hospitals in each site area, prioritizing hospitals that had participated in the 2011 survey. Each hospital selected 1 day on which a random sample of patients was identified for assessment. Trained staff reviewed medical records using the 2011 definitions of health care-associated infections. We compared the percentages of patients with health care-associated infections and performed multivariable log-binomial regression modeling to evaluate the association of survey year with the risk of health care-associated infections. RESULTS: In 2015, a total of 12,299 patients in 199 hospitals were surveyed, as compared with 11,282 patients in 183 hospitals in 2011. Fewer patients had health care-associated infections in 2015 (394 patients [3.2%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.9 to 3.5]) than in 2011 (452 [4.0%; 95% CI, 3.7 to 4.4]) (P<0.001), largely owing to reductions in the prevalence of surgical-site and urinary tract infections. Pneumonia, gastrointestinal infections (most of which were due to Clostridium difficile [now Clostridioides difficile]), and surgical-site infections were the most common health care-associated infections. Patients' risk of having a health care-associated infection was 16% lower in 2015 than in 2011 (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P=0.005), after adjustment for age, presence of devices, days from admission to survey, and status of being in a large hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of health care-associated infections was lower in 2015 than in 2011. To continue to make progress in the prevention of such infections, prevention strategies against C. difficile infection and pneumonia should be augmented. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1801550

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Candida species are a leading cause of health care-associated bloodstream infections in the United States and elsewhere.

    “In the United States and elsewhere, Candida species are a leading cause of health care–associated bloodstream infections (3–5).”

    From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — Four Sites, United States, 2012–2016 (2019) · cites this paper as [3]

    Table 5 (Additional information) reports Candida species in 7 of 52 health care-associated bloodstream infections (13%) in the U.S. survey, supporting their description as a leading cause there. The paper does not provide evidence for the claim about countries elsewhere. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Candidemia is the second most common cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections nationally.

    “Candidemia is also the second most common cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) nationally.26”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Candidemia is a common cause of health care-associated bloodstream infections in the United States.

    “Candidemia, a bloodstream infection caused by Candida spp., is a common cause of health care–associated bloodstream infections in the United States.”
  • Candidemia is a common healthcare-associated bloodstream infection in the United States with significant morbidity and 25%-40% all-cause in-hospital mortality.

    “Candidemia is one of the most common healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in the United States (US) [1,2].It is associated with significant morbidity and 25%-40% all-cause in-hospital mortality [3].”

    From Burden of Candidemia in the United States, 2017 (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. NHSN e-news. Vol. 12, No.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magill, S. S., O’Leary, E., Janelle, S. J., Thompson, D. L., Dumyati, G., Nadle, J., Wilson, L. E., Kainer, M. A., Lynfield, R., Greissman, S., Ray, S. M., Beldavs, Z., Gross, C., Bamberg, W., Sievers, M., Concannon, C., Buhr, N., Warnke, L., Maloney, M., Ocampo, V., Brooks, J., Oyewumi, T., Sharmin, S., Richards, K., Rainbow, J., Samper, M., Hancock, E. B., Leaptrot, D., Scalise, E., Badrun, F., Phelps, R., & Edwards, J. R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-11
Volume
379
Issue
18
Pages
1732-1744
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2898649154
Cited by
1,249
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
84.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (public-domain)
Funders
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (CK17 1701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
Keywords
nosocomial infections, infection prevalence, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, Clostridium difficile infection, nosocomial pneumonia, infection control, hospitalized patients, point prevalence survey, Emerging Infections Program, infection prevention practices, gastrointestinal infections, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Catheterization, Clostridium Infections, Cross Infection, Hospital Bed Capacity, Hospital Units, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Regression Analysis, Respiration, Artificial, Surgical Wound Infection, United States, Urinary Tract Infections, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review