Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 828

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Dose Daunorubicin in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Löwenberg, Bob, Ossenkoppele, Gert J., van Putten, Wim, Schouten, Harry C., Graux, Carlos, Ferrant, Augustin, Sonneveld, Pieter, Maertens, Johan, Jongen-Lavrencic, Mojca, von Lilienfeld-Toal, Marie, Biemond, Bart J., Vellenga, Edo, Kooy, Marinus van Marwijk, Verdonck, Leo F., Beck, Joachim, Döhner, Hartmut, Gratwohl, Alois, Pabst, Thomas, Verhoef, Gregor·2009·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A complete remission is essential for prolonging survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Daunorubicin is a cornerstone of the induction regimen, but the optimal dose is unknown. In older patients, it is usual to give daunorubicin at a dose of 45 to 50 mg per square meter of body-surface area. METHODS: Patients in whom AML or high-risk refractory anemia had been newly diagnosed and who were 60 to 83 years of age (median, 67) were randomly assigned to receive cytarabine, at a dose of 200 mg per square meter by continuous infusion for 7 days, plus daunorubicin for 3 days, either at the conventional dose of 45 mg per square meter (411 patients) or at an escalated dose of 90 mg per square meter (402 patients); this treatment was followed by a second cycle of cytarabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter every 12 hours [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] for 6 days. The primary end point was event-free survival. RESULTS: The complete remission rates were 64% in the group that received the escalated dose of daunorubicin and 54% in the group that received the conventional dose (P=0.002); the rates of remission after the first cycle of induction treatment were 52% and 35%, respectively (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hematologic toxic effects, 30-day mortality (11% and 12% in the two groups, respectively), or the incidence of moderate, severe, or life-threatening adverse events (P=0.08). Survival end points in the two groups did not differ significantly overall, but patients in the escalated-treatment group who were 60 to 65 years of age, as compared with the patients in the same age group who received the conventional dose, had higher rates of complete remission (73% vs. 51%), event-free survival (29% vs. 14%), and overall survival (38% vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AML who are older than 60 years of age, escalation of the dose of daunorubicin to twice the conventional dose, with the entire dose administered in the first induction cycle, effects a more rapid response and a higher response rate than does the conventional dose, without additional toxic effects. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN77039377; and Netherlands National Trial Register number, NTR212.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0901409

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1056/NEJM199909303411407 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2731 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJM199506223322504 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Godwin JE, 1998, Blood, 91, 3607, 10.1182/blood.V91.10.3607 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1182/blood.V98.5.1302 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1182/blood.V98.3.548 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baer MR, 2002, Blood, 100, 1224, 10.1182/blood.V100.4.1224.h81602001224_1224_1232 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0354 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1686 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1395 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lowenberg B, 1989, J Clin Oncol, 7, 1268, 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1268 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0145-2126(01)00006-6 · doi:10.1016/s0145-2126(01)00006-6
  13. 10.1002/cncr.22976 · DOI
  14. 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.0259 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06403.x · DOI
  16. Kahn SB, 1984, J Clin Oncol, 2, 865, 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.8.865 · DOI
  17. 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.133 · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.02.133
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07604.x · DOI
  19. 10.1002/cncr.21723 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lowenberg B, 1998, J Clin Oncol, 16, 872, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.872 · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.872
  21. 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1182/blood-2006-04-014324 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4245 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07663.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1056/NEJM199410063311402 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 828

Metadata

Authors
Löwenberg, B., Ossenkoppele, G. J., van Putten, W., Schouten, H. C., Graux, C., Ferrant, A., Sonneveld, P., Maertens, J., Jongen-Lavrencic, M., von Lilienfeld-Toal, M., Biemond, B. J., Vellenga, E., Kooy, M. V. M., Verdonck, L. F., Beck, J., Döhner, H., Gratwohl, A., Pabst, T., & Verhoef, G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2009-09-24
Volume
361
Issue
13
Pages
1235-1248
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2079025304
Cited by
828
References
1
FWCI
37.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Dose Daunorubicin in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0901409
The paper
Löwenberg, B., Ossenkoppele, G. J., van Putten, W., Schouten, H. C., Graux, C., Ferrant, A., Sonneveld, P., Maertens, J., Jongen-Lavrencic, M., von Lilienfeld-Toal, M., Biemond, B. J., Vellenga, E., Kooy, M. V. M., Verdonck, L. F., Beck, J., Döhner, H., Gratwohl, A., Pabst, T., & Verhoef, G. (2009). High-Dose Daunorubicin in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0901409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.