The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Occult Metastases on Survival in Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Retrospective and observational analyses suggest that occult lymph-node metastases are an important prognostic factor for disease recurrence or survival among patients with breast cancer. Prospective data on clinical outcomes from randomized trials according to sentinel-node involvement have been lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned women with breast cancer to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy plus axillary dissection or sentinel-lymph-node biopsy alone. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of sentinel lymph nodes obtained from patients with pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes were centrally evaluated for occult metastases deeper in the blocks. Both routine staining and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin were used at two widely spaced additional tissue levels. Treating physicians were unaware of the findings, which were not used for clinical treatment decisions. The initial evaluation at participating sites was designed to detect all macrometastases larger than 2 mm in the greatest dimension. RESULTS: Occult metastases were detected in 15.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 17.1) of 3887 patients. Log-rank tests indicated a significant difference between patients in whom occult metastases were detected and those in whom no occult metastases were detected with respect to overall survival (P=0.03), disease-free survival (P=0.02), and distant-disease-free interval (P=0.04). The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios for death, any outcome event, and distant disease were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.86), 1.31 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.60), and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.66), respectively. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival among patients in whom occult metastases were detected and those without detectable metastases were 94.6% and 95.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Occult metastases were an independent prognostic variable in patients with sentinel nodes that were negative on initial examination; however, the magnitude of the difference in outcome at 5 years was small (1.2 percentage points). These data do not indicate a clinical benefit of additional evaluation, including immunohistochemical analysis, of initially negative sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003830.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4 · Cited by 6,379
Nonparametric Statistical Inference
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_205502 · Cited by 2,386
Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases
Carter, C. L., Allen, C., & Henson, D. E. (1989) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::aid-cncr2820630129>3.0.co;2-h · Cited by 2,288
Krag, D. N., Anderson, S. J., Julian, T. B., Brown, A. M., Harlow, S. P., Costantino, J. P., Ashikaga, T., Weaver, D. L., Mamounas, E. P., Jalovec, L. M., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70207-2 · Cited by 1,920
Self-citationLyman, G. H., Giuliano, A. E., Somerfield, M. R., Benson, A. B., Bodurka, D. C., Burstein, H. J., Cochran, A. J., Cody, H. S., Edge, S. B., Galper, S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.08.001 · Cited by 1,887
Self-citationKrag, D. N., Anderson, S. J., Julian, T. B., Brown, A. M., Harlow, S. P., Ashikaga, T., Weaver, D. L., Miller, B. J., Jalovec, L. M., Frazier, T. G., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70278-4 · Cited by 1,060
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
Litjens, G., Sánchez, C. I., Timofeeva, N., Hermsen, M., Nagtegaal, I., Kovacs, I., Hulsbergen - van de Kaa, C., Bult, P., van Ginneken, B., & van der Laak, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26286 · Cited by 1,069
Steiner, D. F., MacDonald, R., Liu, Y., Truszkowski, P., Hipp, J. D., Gammage, C., Thng, F., Peng, L., & Stumpe, M. C. (2018) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001151 · Cited by 489
Challa, B., Tahir, M., Hu, Y., Kellough, D., Lujan, G., Sun, S., Parwani, A. V., & Li, Z. (2023) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100216 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, D. L., Ashikaga, T., Krag, D. N., Skelly, J. M., Anderson, S. J., Harlow, S. P., Julian, T. B., Mamounas, E. P., & Wolmark, N.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2011-02-03
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 412-421
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2146745078
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Occult Metastases on Survival in Node-Negative Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1008108
- The paper
- Weaver, D. L., Ashikaga, T., Krag, D. N., Skelly, J. M., Anderson, S. J., Harlow, S. P., Julian, T. B., Mamounas, E. P., & Wolmark, N. (2011). Effect of Occult Metastases on Survival in Node-Negative Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1008108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.