Cited by 2,911Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy

Open access
The AIM-HIGH Investigators·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with established cardiovascular disease, residual cardiovascular risk persists despite the achievement of target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with statin therapy. It is unclear whether extended-release niacin added to simvastatin to raise low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is superior to simvastatin alone in reducing such residual risk. METHODS: We randomly assigned eligible patients to receive extended-release niacin, 1500 to 2000 mg per day, or matching placebo. All patients received simvastatin, 40 to 80 mg per day, plus ezetimibe, 10 mg per day, if needed, to maintain an LDL cholesterol level of 40 to 80 mg per deciliter (1.03 to 2.07 mmol per liter). The primary end point was the first event of the composite of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome, or symptom-driven coronary or cerebral revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 3414 patients were randomly assigned to receive niacin (1718) or placebo (1696). The trial was stopped after a mean follow-up period of 3 years owing to a lack of efficacy. At 2 years, niacin therapy had significantly increased the median HDL cholesterol level from 35 mg per deciliter (0.91 mmol per liter) to 42 mg per deciliter (1.08 mmol per liter), lowered the triglyceride level from 164 mg per deciliter (1.85 mmol per liter) to 122 mg per deciliter (1.38 mmol per liter), and lowered the LDL cholesterol level from 74 mg per deciliter (1.91 mmol per liter) to 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter). The primary end point occurred in 282 patients in the niacin group (16.4%) and in 274 patients in the placebo group (16.2%) (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.21; P=0.79 by the log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL cholesterol levels of less than 70 mg per deciliter (1.81 mmol per liter), there was no incremental clinical benefit from the addition of niacin to statin therapy during a 36-month follow-up period, despite significant improvements in HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Abbott Laboratories; AIM-HIGH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00120289.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1107579

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Castelli WP, 1988, Can J Cardiol, 4, 5A

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,019

Metadata

Authors
The AIM-HIGH Investigators
Corresponding author
The AIM-HIGH Investigators
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
365
Issue
24
Pages
2255-2267
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2165605025
Cited by
2,911
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 208 · 2017: 203 · 2016: 264 · 2015: 302 · 2014: 316 · 2013: 333 · 2012: 192
FWCI
280.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • Genentech
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
nicotinic acid, simvastatin, HDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, residual cardiovascular risk, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, extended-release niacin, ezetimibe, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular risk reduction, statin therapy, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization
MeSH terms
Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Niacin, Triglycerides, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Failure, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Atherosclerosis, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review